youngen Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 If he happened to go back to Citys youth team and break his leg, my heart would be a little more glad. He now falls in the category of Oldham reject, City :censored: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beag_teeets Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 If he happened to go back to Citys youth team and break his leg, my heart would be a little more glad. He now falls in the category of Oldham reject, City :censored: Why can't we all just be friends? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluehobbit Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 If he happened to go back to Citys youth team and break his leg, my heart would be a little more glad. He now falls in the category of Oldham reject, City :censored: a bit harsh something has gone on somewhere probably that he expected to walk into the team and didn't looks to have ability on the ball but Montano is flying at the mo and Sid is improving so unless we played him off a front man or CM not sure where he was meant to play. Not really bothered either way but the big build up now looks a bit OTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Break The Silence Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 To be fair the players coming out of city's youth and reserves are quite poor standard. Scapuzzi rusnak Mancini. Only really wabara who was any good! That's a bit unfair to Scapuzzi, thought he did ok, was just a bit lightweight. Mancini however, was utter toss, i'll give you that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldhamSheridan Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 <cough>Harry Bunn</Cough> I'm with Adam, the City youngsters being lent out to this level are crap, and don't stick a chance in hell of making it at City's level*. *They may get the odd league cup/Chumpions league run out when it doesn't matter, but I'd be stunned if any made it to anything near first team level on a consistent basis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamoafc Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 He spat his dummy out cause he was asked to play in the reserves. Went to viera who told him to come back and apologise. Says to me bridges haven't been burned! They might want to help us more now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 From M.E.N. "Midfielder Albert Rusnak has left Boundary Park and returned to parent club Manchester City after refusing to play for Oldham Reserves." http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/youngster-back-manchester-city-after-6057783 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankly Mr Shankly Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 From M.E.N. "Midfielder Albert Rusnak has left Boundary Park and returned to parent club Manchester City after refusing to play for Oldham Reserves." http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/youngster-back-manchester-city-after-6057783 What an absolute cock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 From M.E.N. "Midfielder Albert Rusnak has left Boundary Park and returned to parent club Manchester City after refusing to play for Oldham Reserves." http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/youngster-back-manchester-city-after-6057783 If that's the case then Rusnak's an idiot and no loss at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 <cough>Harry Bunn</Cough> I'm with Adam, the City youngsters being lent out to this level are crap, and don't stick a chance in hell of making it at City's level*. *They may get the odd league cup/Chumpions league run out when it doesn't matter, but I'd be stunned if any made it to anything near first team level on a consistent basis. I am not sure, I think it is more a case of the Billy Big Bollocks attititude and they think they are a cut above us. I think we may be the stick rather than the carrot option. Not just City, but how many players have we had that don't apply themsleves here, and go on to perform moderately well at Championship and above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburbri Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 What a bellend. Good to see Johnson not taking any rubbish from a jumped up nineteen year old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Good luck to him when they let him go and he pitches up at Blackburn on the bench Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Oldham clearly didn't give Rusnak a chance so why draft him in to replace a departed player?. Why loan a player from an English Premier League club for a tin pot League One reserves team?, if you ask me it's a slap in the face for a great young future talent imo. Oldham don't deserve Albert Rusnak and Rusnak shouldn't have apologised to Oldham, Patrick Vieira you are completely wrong and out of order for forcing the kid to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 He refused to play for reserves and went back to City. Vieira told him to return to Oldham and apologise, which he did. Then termination of loan was agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pk200 Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Oldham clearly didn't give Rusnak a chance so why draft him in to replace a departed player?. Why loan a player from an English Premier League club for a tin pot League One reserves team?, if you ask me it's a slap in the face for a great young future talent imo. Oldham don't deserve Albert Rusnak and Rusnak shouldn't have apologised to Oldham, Patrick Vieira you are completely wrong and out of order for forcing the kid to do so. Rubbish....no player is bigger than the club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamoafc Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Oldham clearly didn't give Rusnak a chance so why draft him in to replace a departed player?. Why loan a player from an English Premier League club for a tin pot League One reserves team?, if you ask me it's a slap in the face for a great young future talent imo. Oldham don't deserve Albert Rusnak and Rusnak shouldn't have apologised to Oldham, Patrick Vieira you are completely wrong and out of order for forcing the kid to do so. And that is what is wrong with young footballers. If he had show great signs he would be starting. He played at shrewsbury and was the worst player on the pitch! He is 19 and not achieved anything. Yes he should have to apologise, am sure viera who has won more in his career than this little stuck up kid will ever achieve, knows what he has done wrong therefore asked him to apologise. Bad attitude breeds not what we need. Well done LJ nice to see a manager standing firm against premier league youngsters on far too much money! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Oldham clearly didn't give Rusnak a chance so why draft him in to replace a departed player?. Why loan a player from an English Premier League club for a tin pot League One reserves team?, if you ask me it's a slap in the face for a 'great young future talent imo. Oldham don't deserve Albert Rusnak and Rusnak shouldn't have apologised to Oldham, Patrick Vieira you are completely wrong and out of order for forcing the kid to do so.Rot. He has a professional duty to do his job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Gudetti, Razak, Suarez. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Villains Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 If he happened to go back to Citys youth team and break his leg, my heart would be a little more glad. He now falls in the category of Oldham reject, City :censored: I'm sure he'll miss being here loads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Oldham clearly didn't give Rusnak a chance so why draft him in to replace a departed player?. Why loan a player from an English Premier League club for a tin pot League One reserves team?, if you ask me it's a slap in the face for a great young future talent imo. Oldham don't deserve Albert Rusnak and Rusnak shouldn't have apologised to Oldham, Patrick Vieira you are completely wrong and out of order for forcing the kid to do so. You've suprised me here Metty, can only assume you're concern is for the continued loan of City players. He was only in the EDS, and therefore playing at a level lower than our reserves anyway. If Latics think he is in the wrong, and City do too, to the extent they forced him to apologise, then that is enough for me. He may have been loaned to us to sort his attitude out in the first place and teach him about a real footballers life. Anyway, by the sounds of it, he'll be playing with the Youths for a while....! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancy lad Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Oldham clearly didn't give Rusnak a chance so why draft him in to replace a departed player?. Why loan a player from an English Premier League club for a tin pot League One reserves team?, if you ask me it's a slap in the face for a great young future talent imo. Oldham don't deserve Albert Rusnak and Rusnak shouldn't have apologised to Oldham, Patrick Vieira you are completely wrong and out of order for forcing the kid to do so. Absolute load of bollocks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 By Dog Law I own his training facility Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Burns Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 By Dog Law I own his training facility Its mine now because I left a higher mark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristolatic Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Oldham clearly didn't give Rusnak a chance so why draft him in to replace a departed player?. Why loan a player from an English Premier League club for a tin pot League One reserves team?, if you ask me it's a slap in the face for a great young future talent imo. Oldham don't deserve Albert Rusnak and Rusnak shouldn't have apologised to Oldham, Patrick Vieira you are completely wrong and out of order for forcing the kid to do so. Complete and utter crap, if you don't mind me saying so. Whether you're playing for your parent team or another on loan, you only get into the starting XI on ability and performance. If that's not up to scratch, some other bugger who is a better option plays instead. It's part and parcel of being a professional footballer, part of your learning curve, and if you're not selected, you work bloody hard, even in the reserves if need be, to prove you deserve your place. If Rusnak has chucked his teddies out because he doesn't think he should play in the reserves, then it was the right thing to do to end the loan spell. Do you really want a 19 year old kid dictating what he does? No, not for me. How many of our "regular first teamers" have been dropped into the reserves or sat on the bench and had to fight their way back? It's what you do and, in most cases, they've done it. Wesolowski is a prime example. Well done, LJ and Viera. You've shown you had the balls that you have the right work ethics, which is more than Rusnak has done. The one good thing that can come out of this is that the lad has learned from it and will go on to have decent career, including loan spells if needs be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted September 18, 2013 Share Posted September 18, 2013 Oldham clearly didn't give Rusnak a chance so why draft him in to replace a departed player?. Why loan a player from an English Premier League club for a tin pot League One reserves team?, if you ask me it's a slap in the face for a great young future talent imo. Oldham don't deserve Albert Rusnak and Rusnak shouldn't have apologised to Oldham, Patrick Vieira you are completely wrong and out of order for forcing the kid to do so. Rubbish. The manager saw fit to start other players ahead of him. It's his job to pick what is, in his opinion, the best starting 11. Are you saying he should start Rusnak ahead of others who've worked hard to earn a first team place just because of who he is and where he's from, despite him doing nothing much during the short spells he has been on the pitch? And LJ probably wanted to drill him in a few things ahead of the next game not to mention get/keep his match fitness up. Surely any player who didn't do a full 90 minutes last game would expect (if not want) a run out in the reserves? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.