Pine Villains Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackey Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 THIS ISN'T EVEN AN OFFICIAL THREAD!?! WHO APPROVED IT?! NO ONE! THAT'S WHO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underdog Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 THIS ISN'T EVEN AN OFFICIAL THREAD!?! WHO APPROVED IT?! NO ONE! THAT'S WHO! Ackey OUT!!!!!!!! AS HE IS SHOUTIING IN TEXT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palmer1 Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 (edited) We haven't won a game all season Mills didn't play enough for Shrewsbury last year and is still in our squad! And I have not seen one swear word in the whole of this thread! :censored:in ridiculous! Edited August 14, 2014 by palmer1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted August 14, 2014 Author Share Posted August 14, 2014 Knee jerk reaction = we're rubbish. Poor caliber of strikers / midfielders / defenders / goal keepers to chose from, with negative tactics.[/size] A question as I don't get to BP too much, what with living in Milton Keynes.[/size] From my eyes, the only viable way we can improve is to up the gate receipts to have a larger budget to attract the better players. Why would you play negative football and lose / draw more than you win at home? How would that increase the foot fall? I thought we were on to a winner last season given the style of play. Admittedly we lost more than we should have, but were the better team playing the better football more often than not. [/size] This to me, if persevered, would / could have added numbers to the gate as the entertainment would be more enjoyable / exciting. So my question is this. Why did the club change its ethos to negative football, lowering the gate and therefore the budget in the process and how, given the football knowledge the manager / coaching team / backroom staff etc have, honestly believe x10-x15 games of attractive football with slightly below average results is enough to rip it up and start over with boring football? [/size] If you take aside the Peterborough flook (lets be honest, it won't happen again in a decade), what were the outstanding performances of the new tactics? I honestly believe we would have finished 15th-18th last season if we had maintained the attractive football which is where we finished anyway.[/size] best this season = just about stay up with 3rd round FA Cup run. worst this season = relegated[/size] prediction = 19th-20th[/size] You must have enormous jerky knees Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAC0AFC Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 I cant believe you actually bothered to explain the joke. Can the admin please ban the person who didnt get the joke, for driving LaticsPete to this? it was a joke? lee mack tells jokes, they make people laugh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.