Jump to content

Cristian Montano to sue club


Recommended Posts

Every time I've read a response from Montano or his lawyer, I always get the impression that they're not sure why people would be upset. Even if the footage was bravado and he was simply trying to get out of a threatening situation, the fact that he managed to get in that kind of situation in the first place was enough for me to want him as far away from the club as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"However, should this go to court then we look forward to making public the various issues with Cristian that led to our decision to terminate his contract."

 

Sounds like there's a few more things that led to the sacking.

The fact he lied about being on bail for gang rape wouldn't of helped his case either, what is it with footballers these days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"At the time I felt like my life had ended. Nobody would listen to me. My agent turned his back on me and we were thrown out of the club when I went in with my PFA representative. I always said that there was more to this than met the eye. I wanted to give my version of events but nobody would listen."

 

You've been caught on camera admitting spot-fixing, you brought the club's reputation into disrepute, prat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usual advisory guys and gals: Anything you say must be substantiated by evidence and not slanderous towards Mr Montano. We are all entitled to our opinion and the video evidence is there to be viewed. But take caution that if there is litigation ongoing you not only place yourself but also OWTB and even the Club at risk of being damaged by it. We will of course do the best we can to mitigate posts which break the rules but we can't guarantee that, of course.

 

Thanks as always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usual advisory guys and gals: Anything you say must be substantiated by evidence and not slanderous towards Mr Montano. We are all entitled to our opinion and the video evidence is there to be viewed. But take caution that if there is litigation ongoing you not only place yourself but also OWTB and even the Club at risk of being damaged by it. We will of course do the best we can to mitigate posts which break the rules but we can't guarantee that, of course.

 

Thanks as always.

 

Can I state as fact that he is a :censored:?

 

I don't have evidence but its a pretty sure thing.

 

:censored:.

Edited by blueatheart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the time, it was alluded to that other factors, not just the video evidence of the spot fixing, was behind the clubs decision to sack him.

 

Corney on that piece also quite strongly states it again.

 

There is clearly more to this than merely the spot fixing, which was IMO more than enough to fire him for.

 

Looks like it'll come out in the wash now he's starting legal proceedings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The decision to make public the fact that his dismissal had nothing to do with the rape allegation against him now looks to be slightly silly.

In the unlikely event that he wins, we've got a probable easy win against Mr Mahmood aka The Fake Sheikh. In fact if the spot fixing scandal has no merit whatsoever, even if we beat Montano we'd have a pretty good case against Mahmood, and the Paper he was working for.

Personally I did think Montano's sacking was a bit hasty at the time, but we'd have been easily within our rights to suspend him without pay. As his contract was up in June, that wouldn't have gotten renewed, therefore it becomes a not so difficult case to defend, especially given the rape allegation and some obvious other misdemeanours too. Montano has to prove that no reasonable employer wouldn't have sacked him, and although he was the only one sacked that was accused in the same incident, I think one or two were without clubs and most of the others didn't get their contracts renewed in the summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume he's been told he won't be facing any charges over the spot fixing..?

Released from bail but investigation ongoing i think.

Lawfully you have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that you are guilty. In employment law that is not the case. It is based on probability and if the club can prove he probably did it then they will be fine. The fact he's on video i would say shows he probably did it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...