Danbright12

'family club' went out of the window seasons back when we had FA warning coming out of our ears. A 'family club' isn't a family club if its supporters keep being reminded it's on it's last warning.

Not to assume to much, but it is slowly becoming very plausible that these 'Chinese investors' may actually bought a % in a club. Although I know Clarke's wages are high and that will cover the arrival of Stokes and Taylor, Matt Chambers stated on twitter that we are attempting to keep hold of Clarke still, so I have no idea how we can afford Clarke, Taylor and Stokes wages on our budget. Here's praying!!!!

The club and land i.e. stadium etc... are separate entities. SC owns the club, SB/DG own the land which is held under Brass Bank. As for as I am aware we got told last week. The amount we owe to Blitz is capped at 4m, which will only be repaid if we ever reach the premiership. Effectively, if someone was to buy us, they would have to buy the club, as in OAFC, and then separately negotiate a deal for the stadium/surrounding land. On the unlikely event the Chinese investors have bought 30%, I am inclined to assume this would be 30% of the club, not the land/stadium. If a buy-out of the entirety arouse (i.e. everything) I would assume the whole cost would be around 8m, going from figures and land worth.

He promised we could see the statements, so on the next meeting we'll put pressure on to see proof, just to confirm it

To be fair, he had the club accountant on the phone who went though the numbers, it appesrs he is currently funding our deficit

Face scrunity for what exactly?

Slightly, still got a lot to answer for in relation to communication/mistakes etc...

Number may look poor, but considering Chaddy End was 3/4 empty, only leaves 3,000 spare seats in home ends, could be worse

Train tickets to Shrewbury booked, anyone else going on train, if so what time?

Aye, i second this!

Although background issues are in need of urgent attention and can't just be forgotten for another 6 months, lets get behind Sheridan and finally have something to cheer for. Hoping for a big turnout at Shrewsbury now and an upping in home attendances!!

My bad, i read it as 5.7 + 700k. Apologies. Everythings become very off the point, my point was, although they may have owed us the money as a technicality (which i concede now after comments) the money was intended to be used as an investment for re-development of Boundary Park for a new North Stand.I was disputing the comment about it wasnt an investment but that it was owed.

You're entitled to your opinion, i havent got any more time to waste replying in a dead-end argument On a further point, its all well and good being 'fly' behind an account name (no disrespect to anyone else that hasn't used their actual name), but I am stating things that I have read on the internet, papers and heard and my take on the matter which I'm entitled to do, as it is a forum. I'm not ashamed to say what my take on the club is using my real name (in which I am mistaken from time to time on facts), yet you can very easily give grief sat behind an account and from the looks of it, are being a passive member in the crisis that are club is in. At least I'm actually trying to do something.

Im just stating it was a redevelopment fund, which is on the internet to see, thats all im saying. The money was to fund the new stand.

Just embarassing for you, if you cant prove yourself you automatically go on the defensive. My point on redevelopment fund is based on evidence, yours is based on speculation.Forum has turned into a slagging contest if someone has an alternative view.