Jump to content

Micah - this week's raising of hopes


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 891
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

therefore filling another dubious solicitors pockets with the fees and leaving us with enough for a Nandos. Yes solicitors are dubious ..... see Megsons/Chartbridge/Hilton Legal. Oldham Chron articles.... and SRA actions.http://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/597332.article

 

The whole Richards situation a farce....and sooner over better. If he signs in Summer City are benefitting financially now by offloading wages how corrupt.

 

Richards will be out of contract next summer, in that case would Fiorentina be obliged to pay a transfer fee if its not included in the loan deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

therefore filling another dubious solicitors pockets with the fees and leaving us with enough for a Nandos. Yes solicitors are dubious ..... see Megsons/Chartbridge/Hilton Legal. Oldham Chron articles.... and SRA actions.http://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/597332.article

 

The whole Richards situation a farce....and sooner over better. If he signs in Summer City are benefitting financially now by offloading wages how corrupt.

Eh?

 

How are they benefitting financially by keeping 100% of nothing rather than 80% of a fee?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Eh ?? They are taking a loan fee PLUS saving % of 70k a week on wages for rest of season therefore benefit financially ....getting more back than the free at end of season and paying wages for season whilst sits on arse. If they could sell of course but thats not the way Richards is playing it. Perhaps if a lower fee agreed at end being part of deal??? We will never know.

So they wouldn't rather sell him for £5m or £10m or more like us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MEN reporting a loan fee likely

 

"Reports in Italy suggest a loan deal is in the offing, with City receiving a fee upon its completion - as they did with Gareth Barry's move to Everton, despite his contract having expired."

 

but , of course, it's the devil in the detail of the agreement signed with City all those years ago as , and FA regs and interpretations, that will determine if anything comes our way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt we'll get sod all but at what point would the authorities (or courts) step in, do you suppose? Torres has just gone on a two-year loan. What if Richards did the same for a hefty loan fee? What if he had five years left on his contract and City 'loaned' him out for five years for £10m? Obviously it would still depend on the wording of the contract but I think a court would take a dim view of a bigger club trying to work its way around such a clause in that manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt we'll get sod all but at what point would the authorities (or courts) step in, do you suppose? Torres has just gone on a two-year loan. What if Richards did the same for a hefty loan fee? What if he had five years left on his contract and City 'loaned' him out for five years for £10m? Obviously it would still depend on the wording of the contract but I think a court would take a dim view of a bigger club trying to work its way around such a clause in that manner.

 

Few seasons ago think Bradford got money from United for the loan fees they received for Cleverley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

City got a fee for Barry even though he was out of contract, it was part of the original loan deal.

 

Correct Senor, and if the Fiorentina deal is similar surely the Latics will get a percentage of that agreed fee next season?

We will just have to wait a year for it.

My reservation is loan deals have been terminated early by many other clubs, what happens if that happens with Richards come next June?

Edited by BP1960
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct Senor, and if the Fiorentina deal is similar surely the Latics will get a percentage of that agreed fee next season?

We will just have to wait a year for it.

 

That would be dependant on Richards deciding he wants to stay with Fiorentina whereas, as a free agent, his wage negotiations other clubs would be more in his favour as they'd have no fee to pay. He'll do a season in Italy & then be back to Blighty on a free next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be dependant on Richards deciding he wants to stay with Fiorentina whereas, as a free agent, his wage negotiations other clubs would be more in his favour as they'd have no fee to pay. He'll do a season in Italy & then be back to Blighty on a free next year.

I recogn so as well, we can all hope that he's going to like it in Italy and he'll sign up for them but it's hard to believe with the number of clubs interested in him this time round, it will be a war of the wages at the end of the season and I can't see Fiorentina winning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.foxsportsasia.com/football/news/detail/item1039343


"Richards arrived in Florence on Monday morning to undergo a medical before completing his switch to the Serie A outfit.


As part of the agreement, Fiorentina will hold an option to make Richards' move permanent next summer."


So if they don't want him, no money for the Latics?


Edited by BP1960
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...