Jump to content

Further info on winding up petition process


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 599
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

4 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

You couldn't have known so I'll let it go, but it is a regulatory requirement. Don't sweat it.

So it is not cash rich then if it is not disposable is it?

When you say you are a director in a financial company I assume you mean you direct people from the front desk to the lift?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Magister said:

So it is not cash rich then if it is not disposable is it?

When you say you are a director in a financial company I assume you mean you direct people from the front desk to the lift?

Yes it still means it's cash rich. 

 

Whatever makes you feel better sweetheart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kowenicki said:

Those aren't new facts.   As senior reps of the trust why don't you ask questions, demand a meeting. Instead of winding up a forum. 

 

I'm not intent on playing down "for some reason".., there you go again with your inferred Machiavellian conspiracy talk.  I am struggling to know why you would rather peddle some agenda on a forum than try, try and try again to engage with the club.  

So they've now gone from rumour status to not-new-facts?  As for a meeting, have you missed all the stuff about repeatedly trying to get the club to explain what the fuck was going on with the scoreboard money? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, whittles left foot said:

 

He was always going to surface again when there is speculation about OAFC financial status-it is in Mastermind terms his 'specialist subject'

Really poor reply.....when are you going to address your board name and its missing apostrophe or do you really sculpture your left foot? 

Edited by Magister
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, kowenicki said:

 

What?   Yes really. I'm not disclosing all on a forum so some numpty (not you) can get all big and clever. 

 

Anyhow. You stated you reported it but was told no result would be forthcoming due to data protection.

 

who did you report it to and when? 

Official Receiver and it was after Liquidation-The Liquidator refused me access to the detailed records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A winding up petition is only one indication that a business may be trading while insolvent. Directors can be found guilty of trading while insolvent if at any point in time they continued to trade when they were or should have been aware that the business was insolvent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being stupid I know, but how do you find out if there has been a "retraction", with regards to our WUP.

 

Do they advertise again that the debt has been "satisfied" and cancel the court appearance, or  do you get as far as the court date and then its announced its "satisfied"?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, underdog said:

Being stupid I know, but how do you find out if there has been a "retraction", with regards to our WUP.

 

Do they advertise again that the debt has been "satisfied" and cancel the court appearance, or  do you get as far as the court date and then its announced its "satisfied"?

 

Thanks in advance

AFAIK it's only published in the London Gazette.

This search encompases other publications, but will give you an idea.

https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices/notice?sort-by=latest-date&text="Oldham+Athletic"&location-distance-1=1&service=all-notices&categorycode-all=all&numberOfLocationSearches=1&results-page-size=10
This e

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 30/03/2017 at 11:37 PM, Magister said:

Really poor reply.....when are you going to address your board name and its missing apostrophe or do you really sculpture your left foot? 

Maybe whittling his left foot is a hobby? An unusual one I grant you but who are we to mock the foibles of others?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, singe said:

Thanks Singe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mcfluff1985 said:

So what? If it wasn't paid would we not have heard more about it? It's been paid. Move on.

Ooo touchy, the club said there would be a retraction, I am lead to believe the gazette posts daily. 

 

I can't see the retraction....so we don't move on.

 

Not unless I missed it which is possible...so have I missed it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

So what? If it wasn't paid would we not have heard more about it? It's been paid. Move on.

No, we wouldn't. We wouldn't hear anything further until the case is seen in court. Unless there was the formal retraction that the club told us was going to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

It is what it is, let us not lose any sleep over it.

Okay so are you saying we wait until May (is it the 8th)? Hearing date

 

and we hope no more creditors add on to it? And if there are any add on creditors are they posted daily or are they all announced on that date?

 

I am genuinely trying to understand the process.

 

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...