Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’m not having it that Pete Wild has picked that team without the influence of the owner & his brother.

 

How is it OK to play Sylla into form, but not Baxter? The latter we know has been successful at a higher level?

 

How can none of the 3 full backs on the bench be a better option than anchoring our most creative (assists) winger to full back and playing Branger?

 

I can’t wait to see what team Scholes ends up playing, assuming he takes the job & doesn’t allow those two to stick their oar in.

Edited by lookersstandandy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, yet again, we have three full backs on the bench and presumably our most creative winger at FB. 

 

If PS is coming in, we can only hope that this is the last time AL interferes with team selection at the expense of results and performance.

 

Recent performances, Macclesfield aside, have been in spite of AL, not because of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bristolatic said:

Interesting on the iFollow line ups. It has Sylla in a back four with Stott at LB. Nepomuceno, Maouche, Missile and Branger in midfield with Lang and Vera up top. We'll find out soon. 

Nah Scott is no left back, on GMR they have just give the team news out and added.... bizarrely Oldham have three fullbacks on the bench but have still chosen to play their best attacking player at fullback....

Edited by yarddog73
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...