mikejh45 Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 2 hours ago, jorvik_latic said: He played some out of necessity. So let me get this straight... Last 3 matches of Scholes's reign (I couldn't be arsed to go back further), Hunt was a regular.....but AL was interfering so Hunt in the team flies in the face of this "interference" argument. PW takes over and AL is interfering and telling PW not to play Hunt but he is still in the match day squad. What am I missing here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wardie Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Hunt play...Hunt couldn't give a f**k. Next... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kowenicki Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 12 hours ago, mikejh45 said: So let me get this straight... Last 3 matches of Scholes's reign (I couldn't be arsed to go back further), Hunt was a regular.....but AL was interfering so Hunt in the team flies in the face of this "interference" argument. PW takes over and AL is interfering and telling PW not to play Hunt but he is still in the match day squad. What am I missing here? Nothing. You are spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 13 hours ago, mikejh45 said: So let me get this straight... Last 3 matches of Scholes's reign (I couldn't be arsed to go back further), Hunt was a regular.....but AL was interfering so Hunt in the team flies in the face of this "interference" argument. PW takes over and AL is interfering and telling PW not to play Hunt but he is still in the match day squad. What am I missing here? Playing for 1 manager (who stated that he wanted no interference from AL) doesn’t back you up. He didn’t play directly before or directly after which shows that it was likely that PW was told not to start him. That’s what you’re missing. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lags Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 20 hours ago, Lee Sinnott said: Expect him to tip up at Swindon... I was about to post didn't Wellens always big him up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 Mistake this imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 3 hours ago, jorvik_latic said: Playing for 1 manager (who stated that he wanted no interference from AL) doesn’t back you up. He didn’t play directly before or directly after which shows that it was likely that PW was told not to start him. That’s what you’re missing. And just trotting out the argument of "interference - end of" doesn't back up your case either. So what's the difference between not selecting him to start and putting him on the bench? Surely if AL was having a direct influence as you say, then Hunt would be training with the kids and totally absent on matchdays. I'm still thinking that this interference card was just an excuse by Scholes to get out because being a manager was not what he thought it would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whittles left foot Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 4 hours ago, jorvik_latic said: Playing for 1 manager (who stated that he wanted no interference from AL) doesn’t back you up. He didn’t play directly before or directly after which shows that it was likely that PW was told not to start him. That’s what you’re missing. If this is the best you can do to suit your own interpretation of 'interference' then you are wasting your and our time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 32 minutes ago, whittles left foot said: If this is the best you can do to suit your own interpretation of 'interference' then you are wasting your and our time. Seriously? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 1 hour ago, mikejh45 said: And just trotting out the argument of "interference - end of" doesn't back up your case either. So what's the difference between not selecting him to start and putting him on the bench? Surely if AL was having a direct influence as you say, then Hunt would be training with the kids and totally absent on matchdays. I'm still thinking that this interference card was just an excuse by Scholes to get out because being a manager was not what he thought it would be. Where did I write “interference - end of”? Weird comment. If I need to explain the difference then there’s no point going further. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLDHAMADE Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 23 hours ago, LT_SMASH said: Great bit of business from our leader. Could have gone to Lincoln for a fee in January, instead gets frozen out of the side till the end of the season, then we release him Exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whittles left foot Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 26 minutes ago, OLDHAMADE said: Exactly Could have gone for a fee allegedly. So wise in hindsight. Since end of Jan played in 11 matches, 2 of which were less than 10 mins-was sub in 6 matches. Hardly strong evidence that he will be missed-plus when he played he wasn't very good was he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whittles left foot Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 1 hour ago, jorvik_latic said: Seriously? Yes. You and others keep banging on about it when in reality Scholes made only a passing remark about it after bailing out. Other than this even Wild denied it was happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 1 hour ago, jorvik_latic said: Where did I write “interference - end of”? Weird comment. If I need to explain the difference then there’s no point going further. Poetic licence, Jorvic. There are still arguments about this 'interference". I have yet to be convinced that it actually took place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 15 minutes ago, whittles left foot said: Yes. You and others keep banging on about it when in reality Scholes made only a passing remark about it after bailing out. Other than this even Wild denied it was happening. It happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 10 minutes ago, mikejh45 said: Poetic licence, Jorvic. There are still arguments about this 'interference". I have yet to be convinced that it actually took place. No skin off my nose if you don’t believe it. I know it did happen. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 33 minutes ago, jorvik_latic said: No skin off my nose if you don’t believe it. I know it did happen. You keep your nose skin, thank you very much. As yet you have offered no proof apart from 'anecdotal'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 There's proof... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 54 minutes ago, mikejh45 said: You keep your nose skin, thank you very much. As yet you have offered no proof apart from 'anecdotal'. I don’t need to offer proof, don’t give a shit if you don’t believe it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 Where's proof? This is a bit like "Young Frankenstein". Gene Wilder: "Werewolf"". Marty Feldman: "Therewolf". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 3 minutes ago, jorvik_latic said: I don’t need to offer proof, don’t give a shit if you don’t believe it. But what the f*ck is this "it" that you expect me to believe? So far, all you've put forward is anecdotal evidence and expect people to accept it as gospel. State clearly your evidence but don't just push Scholes' comments as proof positive because, from my perspective, he was using the "interference" argument to cover his managerial shortcomings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 44 minutes ago, mikejh45 said: But what the f*ck is this "it" that you expect me to believe? So far, all you've put forward is anecdotal evidence and expect people to accept it as gospel. State clearly your evidence but don't just push Scholes' comments as proof positive because, from my perspective, he was using the "interference" argument to cover his managerial shortcomings. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 7 minutes ago, Ryan said: And that means what exactly? I'm assuming you can put forward a cogent argument apart from a dumb-ass emoji. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twisbrogan Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 1 hour ago, mikejh45 said: But what the f*ck is this "it" that you expect me to believe? So far, all you've put forward is anecdotal evidence and expect people to accept it as gospel. State clearly your evidence but don't just push Scholes' comments as proof positive because, from my perspective, he was using the "interference" argument to cover his managerial shortcomings. Out of interest, what is it you would need to see (or expect to be) presented in order to be persuaded that there was interference around his (non) selection? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 21 minutes ago, mikejh45 said: And that means what exactly? I'm assuming you can put forward a cogent argument apart from a dumb-ass emoji. I can show you evidence if you want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.