Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hunt was banished. Scholes brought him back to warm the bench. Hamer go clattered 2 mins into the Yeovil game hence why he played some games. 

 

MJH45. How you still ask for proof as to why Abdallah is a total conman absolutely staggers me. 

 

I presume you also felt Corney did no wrong either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikejh45 said:

 

Not disbelieving what you know but you for those who haven't had this first hand experience, it's difficult to just blindly accept and all we can do is question the subject.

Accept the offer of evidence...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mikejh45 said:

Not really......I understand there are limitations on how to reveal information on a public forum.

 

 

And this is the stage were the accusers seem to run out of steam. Happy to point the finger but unable to tell us why. There is more chance of Boris Johnson telling all than evidence being produced about alleged interference.

 

37 minutes ago, Dave_Og said:

You're no expecting anyone to cut and paste it on here are you?

Cut and paste from what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, whittles left foot said:

And this is the stage were the accusers seem to run out of steam. Happy to point the finger but unable to tell us why. There is more chance of Boris Johnson telling all than evidence being produced about alleged interference.

 

Cut and paste from what?

I've no idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lee Sinnott said:

There are people on this message board who have seen proof...

Not going to contest that but I'm going to throw this comment in.

If I said I have evidence that was irrefutable in the opposite direction, would you just accept my word?

 

Can't wait for responses to the highlighted bit!!! ☺️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mikejh45 said:

Not going to contest that but I'm going to throw this comment in.

If I said I have evidence that was irrefutable in the opposite direction, would you just accept my word?

 

Can't wait for responses to the highlighted bit!!! ☺️

Nope, I wouldn't. Because I have concrete proof. Others have seen it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mikejh45 said:

Not going to contest that but I'm going to throw this comment in.

If I said I have evidence that was irrefutable in the opposite direction, would you just accept my word?

 

Can't wait for responses to the highlighted bit!!! ☺️

I wouldn’t believe you at face value because your previous presents you as, at best, playing devils advocate and at worst a sad act internet arguing loner spouting randomly for the fun of it.

Sinnott and Jorvik have previous for leaking truthful information so therefore l take their posts [mostly] at face value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Monty Burns said:

I wouldn’t believe you at face value because your previous presents you as, at best, playing devils advocate and at worst a sad act internet arguing loner spouting randomly for the fun of it.

Sinnott and Jorvik have previous for leaking truthful information so therefore l take their posts [mostly] at face value.

That is quality coming from you....I don't think you have a genuinely good word for anyone.

Sad......naaah, very happy bloke really.

Internet arguing......absolutely.....no other Latics fan for miles apart from my daughter.

I've have no source and read carefully what is posted so what's wrong with playing devil's advocate until you receive definite proof?

 

Now, about you...…..what has made you into the miserable, obnoxious, argumentative sh*t that you appear to be on here?

 

Edited by mikejh45
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike, you’ve spent the day demanding proof. Two trusted posters have now offered it to you but you don’t seem to be taking them up on their offers. Why is that? 

Edited by Ryan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ryan said:

Mike, you’ve spent the day demanding proof. Two trusted posters have now offered it to you but you don’t seem to be taking them up on their offers. Why is that? 

Ryan.....come on....you are better than that....I've already had early discussions to see Lee Sinnott's proof (see 5 posts back)....why the dig?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lags said:

If you heard the radio interview PW did upon leaving Latics, he pretty much indicated that (especially in his first stint as temp manager) that there was interference

 

That's what I took from the interview too from the comment "there wasn't any interference second time around".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...