Jump to content

Administration


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 957
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 minutes ago, Emcee_Latic said:

Are we sure "Oldham Athletic (2004) Ltd" are buying the ground and not AL.....hence another Brassbank!

Oldham Athletic (2004) ltd IS AL that's what he purchased off cornet.

What happens with its registration after the purchase will be interesting, wont get away with the brassbank trick like the asset strippers did..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abdallah (not the club) to buy Brass Bank off Blitz.

 

Bassini to buy the club off AL.

 

Bassini to refuse to pay landlord (AL) anything because he believes there is a council grant-sized gaping hole in the finances (to the tune of a few million). 
 

AL to put us into admin over unpaid rent. 

 

Bring it on, baby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Monty Burns said:

Oldham Athletic (2004) ltd IS AL that's what he purchased off cornet.

What happens with its registration after the purchase will be interesting, wont get away with the brassbank trick like the asset strippers did..

OAFC 2004 is in fact 75%+ RLJ Global Capital. 

We haven't any concrete proof at the miment that's 100% Lemsagam other than the statement of ownership in the website, and nothing much about the company exists. 

Their address is all but impossible to fund too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, singe said:

OAFC 2004 is in fact 75%+ RLJ Global Capital. 

We haven't any concrete proof at the miment that's 100% Lemsagam other than the statement of ownership in the website, and nothing much about the company exists. 

Their address is all but impossible to fund too.

Love these irony slips me 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, fleetwood Blue said:

How many years was the Trusts ACV status granted for? 
Surely the only way he can recoup his (loan) or Bassini’s money would be to sell land, at least the trust have first refusal if it’s still valid..But it will be at an over inflated price to cover what they have paid out..

Anniversary is this month. There is another 3 years to go.

 

If triggered we have 6 weeks to register an interest to buy and then additional 5 months to pull a bid together.

 

Depending on the trigger and decision if its viable option for the Trust to do this.

 

Lets get today over with

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets not get to downhearted yet, theres a massive difference in AL saying he has the money to buy the land from Blitz and him actually paying it..

We all know he is a serial liar and we all know how desperate he will be to hold on to the club as he could lose it for nothing today if we enter administration..

This could just be a ploy by AL to get the court adjourned and will buy himself more time, in his eyes the only way he can get a return out of oldham is to sell our better players but he cant do that until the transfer window opens again so him buying more time makes sense..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, fleetwood Blue said:

Lets not get to downhearted yet, theres a massive difference in AL saying he has the money to buy the land from Blitz and him actually paying it..

We all know he is a serial liar and we all know how desperate he will be to hold on to the club as he could lose it for nothing today if we enter administration..

This could just be a ploy by AL to get the court adjourned and will buy himself more time, in his eyes the only way he can get a return out of oldham is to sell our better players but he cant do that until the transfer window opens again so him buying more time makes sense..

In this scenario then it only delays the onset of administration, the 12 points would go on next season, not sure that's a good thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, disjointed said:

In this scenario then it only delays the onset of administration, the 12 points would go on next season, not sure that's a good thing. 

That wont affect him but does us, as long as he can buy enough time to squeeze a few quid out of the club before he loses it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Lags said:

Keep your power dry

 

No one on this board knows anything concrete about any deal that may have been agreed or if it will be finalised.

 

For once I am quite enjoying the OWTB experience, happy in a delusional. stupid and blissfully ignorant haze. 

 

Said it before, stick together, support the club. Owners come and go, think for yourselves and don't let the detractors bring you down. I hope those who's first thoughts tonight is that for them the marriage is over, see a small chink of light and stick in there tomorrow. One family at the end of the day.

 

 

Commendable sentiments. However, it's difficult to see any chink of light if AL remains in charge given his track record to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus the melt down

 

Keep calm, social media hysteria it's like the devil. So cunning it leaves the individual believing it's all their own mind deciding. Beat a dog often enough it starts to believe it's bad.

 

Like most things, the truth is somewhere in the middle. Lets see the detail and discuss that rather than OWTB school yard gang rhetoric.

 

The truth of the matter is the situation of who owned what, who wanted to run what, who wanted cash for that, was and is a recipe for disaster with the ego's at play. It needs rectifying. 

 

The best we as fans can do, is support our club for now. Then once the truth of the deal is out there, debate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Worcester Owl said:

Commendable sentiments. However, it's difficult to see any chink of light if AL remains in charge given his track record to date.

 

I can see you're reasoning, he's made some terrible calls. Perhaps due to the untenable situation of who owned what. The player recruitment stuff was ultra poor, lets hope the latest trend is now the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

All a bit pointless unless he is also going to fund a promotion team.

He's not going to have to spend much. Our last 4 home games have been against 4 of the early season promotion favourites. We got 10 points with a GD of +10. 

 

The issue is consistency, especially managerial consistency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

All a bit pointless unless he is also going to fund a promotion team.

You’ve got to go back a bit since we last had a promotion team. There’s been a few owners in that time who didn’t produce one. COYB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Gary1906 said:

You’ve got to go back a bit since we last had a promotion team. There’s been a few owners in that time who didn’t produce one. COYB

They never had season ticket sales as low as this mob...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, deyres42 said:

They never had season ticket sales as low as this mob...

 

That's easy rectified then. Should be a doddle for the supporters to sort that.

 

That said, it requires some coaxing from the board to help it along. Two way street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, rudemedic said:

He's not going to have to spend much. Our last 4 home games have been against 4 of the early season promotion favourites. We got 10 points with a GD of +10. 

 

The issue is consistency, especially managerial consistency. 

The issue is quality and having more of it than your opponents. You generally achieve that by paying higher wages than them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, deyres42 said:

The issue is quality and having more of it than your opponents. You generally achieve that by paying higher wages than them.

 

Yes, it tends to be that way in all walks of life,  certainly in football. It doesn't always follow and sometimes, just like back in 1989/90 season at Latics a side puts together players that become a team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lags said:

 

That's easy rectified then. Should be a doddle for the supporters to sort that.

 

That said, it requires some coaxing from the board to help it along. Two way street.

Think it is going to take more than a gentle coaxing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, singe said:

OAFC 2004 is in fact 75%+ RLJ Global Capital. 

We haven't any concrete proof at the miment that's 100% Lemsagam other than the statement of ownership in the website, and nothing much about the company exists. 

Their address is all but impossible to fund too. 


Allo Allo

 

#frenchlads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...