dean 1984 Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 there match report 1st paragraph states walsall were "denied a share of the spoils after a winner from controversial striker lee hughes." But aparantly the saddlers were the 1st team to offer him a contract, pricks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellysheroes Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 there match report 1st paragraph states walsall were "denied a share of the spoils after a winner from controversial striker lee hughes." But aparantly the saddlers were the 1st team to offer him a contract, pricks haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senor_Coconut Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Have they written anything wrong? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davegtt Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 He is a controversial striker. Theyve not said anything out of turn (God Im agreeing with one of SC's posts) ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hometownclub Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 He banged two goals in to win us the game. VERY SOUR GRAPES. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebus_Latic Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 He banged two goals in to win us the game. VERY SOUR GRAPES. Walsall bitter....................lovely pint, leaves a great taste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Perhaps they're refering to his controversial strictly non-dancing goal-celebration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scapegoat Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 He is a controversial striker. Theyve not said anything out of turn (God Im agreeing with one of SC's posts) ;) Another in agreement. Lee Hughes will always be classed as a controversial striker by the media in general. And when you are away from home and concede a laste winner "denied a share of the points" is fairly standard match report stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stitch_KTF Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 there match report 1st paragraph states walsall were "denied a share of the spoils after a winner from controversial striker lee hughes." But aparantly the saddlers were the 1st team to offer him a contract, pricks I wish I had remembered that last night. Whilst walking back to the car as I passed by their coaches there was an old fella walking alone wearing their colours. Feeling sorry for him I said "hard luck mate, safe journey back", he thanked me but then the coach driver, fag in mouth, piped up "Did Lee Hughes score?", I proudly informed him Hughesy had scored twice, including the late winner, to which he responded "f*****g scummy manc bastards" with the most hate and venom I think I have ever known. Fortunately for him I value being welcome at BP. Had it not been so cold I would have shown him my arse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego_Sideburns Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Had it not been so cold I would have shown him my arse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Break The Silence Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Walsall bitter....................lovely pint, leaves a great taste I prefer Joseph Holt's Smooth Mild myself! Drink of the God's........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.