paulgard Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 Fair enough... good point well put... truce then,merry xmas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigDog Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 (edited) yeah he gives the ball away, but so does lomax. lomax crossing ability is no where near neals , which has been proved over the last few games. defensivley i would say thay are on a par, however neal has held the position for longer and has played at international level and has faired well. he has been scouted by numerous clubs, can take free kicks and pens and has a cracking shot. so can someone explain why lomax is looked at as a good player who is steady and eardley is abused whenever he plays. there must have been about 10 threads on him this season alone. i dont get it So - at the risk of: a. Commenting on something that has already been pointed out b. Getting slagged off for having a go at Lomax c. Making a negative comment I have finally seen the highlights (!) from the Orient game and it is clear to me that Lomax was woeful in covering the man who went on his outside and was pulled down for the pen - shoddy defending methinks. Merry Xmas Edited December 23, 2008 by TheBigDog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 I never said anything about Davies. You reckon you can get away with that one, as your, "CD," boxer shorts aren't as easy to spot as your, "MR," shirt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 You reckon you can get away with that one, as your, "CD," boxer shorts aren't as easy to spot as your, "MR," shirt I'll have you know there's nothing seedy about my boxer shorts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeylandLatic Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 the other 10% is when he's posing in his boxer shorts... You got any sweet pics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 I'll have you know there's nothing seedy about my boxer shorts. Finally learnt that old student trick of putting them on the radiator and knocking the flakes out? Good man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny punkster Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 You got any sweet pics? no,but i know someone who has in fact quite a few here do! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spadam Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 How much do you think we will get? 500k would be nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny punkster Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 How much do you think we will get? 500k would be nice what...for the pics,boxers or him going to bristol city?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stitch_KTF Posted December 24, 2008 Share Posted December 24, 2008 So - at the risk of: a. Commenting on something that has already been pointed out b. Getting slagged off for having a go at Lomax c. Making a negative comment I have finally seen the highlights (!) from the Orient game and it is clear to me that Lomax was woeful in covering the man who went on his outside and was pulled down for the pen - shoddy defending methinks.Merry Xmas I could have told you that at half four on Saturday! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted December 24, 2008 Share Posted December 24, 2008 Finally learnt that old student trick of putting them on the radiator and knocking the flakes out? Good man. Nothing if not predictable, as ever... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.