pukka Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Quite right. If that was the FA's explination, we have been wrong, we hare reveiewing X,Y and z in the future and we will be more hardline - I'd fully support it. However, it isn't. It's just "Suarez desreves that" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 (edited) Full report of the reasoning, includes suggestion that they gave him longer as he didn't think it merited longer so didn't fully understand seriousness of offence. Ex pro on panel was Brian Talbot, presumably the same one. http://www.thefa.com/News/governance/2013/apr/~/media/164A568A93784FE391CC1FDAB4D7313F.ashx Edited April 26, 2013 by rudemedic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Opening that article, I was struck by the question of which one of them I'd punch first. I think Cameron wins. I wouldn't punch Suarez in the face, you might lose a finger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.