OAFCM35 Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 http://www.thesportbible.com/articles/revealed-the-sickening-messages-sent-between-mackay-and-moody Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 What a dick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimsleftfoot Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Wow after reading the Mail article, if true, he may struggle to get another job at a decent level in football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackey Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Hopefully - if true - he'll struggle full stop the :censored:ing scrote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 Which set of players would want him near them in any capacity ?No media work either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pukka Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 (edited) IF true, he will have to work abroad. I can't imagine who in this country would want to touch him. Not that I'd expect many foreign clubs to want him, but the news is never as prominent from another country. Edited August 21, 2014 by pukka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lukers1 Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 He will end up at somewhere like Leeds or Millwall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longtimeblue Posted August 21, 2014 Share Posted August 21, 2014 If clubs take on convicted killers and rapists, it'd seem harsh for someone who's sent a few dubious texts to fall foul of morality in football. Obviously a bit of a prick but as for The Mail getting on their high horse!... Nazi salute picture used an all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 If clubs take on convicted killers and rapists, it'd seem harsh for someone who's sent a few dubious texts to fall foul of morality in football. Obviously a bit of a prick but as for The Mail getting on their high horse!... Nazi salute picture used an all! Spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 Lions Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 Solskjaer should watch his back, Vincent Tan is clearly not the type of owner you want to cross. Cardiff have had these (private)texts since the beginning of the year (allegedly) and the only just release them now just before Malkay was lined up to take the palace job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 Solskjaer should watch his back, Vincent Tan is clearly not the type of owner you want to cross. Cardiff have had these (private)texts since the beginning of the year (allegedly) and the only just release them now just before Malkay was lined up to take the palace job.Didn't Tan cite unauthorised transfers as why he sacked him? If he's had his hand in the till you can't blame him for going to town on the bloke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackey Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 Solskjaer should watch his back, Vincent Tan is clearly not the type of owner you want to cross. Cardiff have had these (private)texts since the beginning of the year (allegedly) and the only just release them now just before Malkay was lined up to take the palace job. The argument is that they had only 2 days left before the FA would no longer have accepted evidence on something (must be an arbitrary statute of limitations they set). Don't get me wrong, I think you point is still incredibly valid, but there is possibly an ever so slightly more innocent angle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 The argument is that they had only 2 days left before the FA would no longer have accepted evidence on something (must be an arbitrary statute of limitations they set). Don't get me wrong, I think you point is still incredibly valid, but there is possibly an ever so slightly more innocent angle. 8 months, since he got fired. I'm not as au fait currently with the specifics of employment law as I have been in the past but if he put his unfair dismissal claim in 2 months after being sacked, which is quite likely as you have 90 days to do so, then they may have another 6 months from that to supply evidence as to why his sacking was legitimate. Hence 8 months. The fact that Makay was going for the Palace job, and was almost certain to get it at the time is a bit more of a coincidence but that doesn't make the coincidence sinister. Tan was looking to get rid of him from early on in their short year in the Prem and got vilified for it, perhaps after keeping all his cards quiet and enduring abuse for it; he has got the nuts as his hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24hoursfromtulsehill Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 I thought Mackay had given up the compensation ghost in May, no? How did "banter" come to mean "sexism" or "racism" or otherwise verboten chatter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.