24hoursfromtulsehill Posted March 19, 2015 Author Share Posted March 19, 2015 Probably dared to have his own opinion. ...in which case he's had a little taste of all the bad things in life he deserves, and which will surely come his way if he gives us enough time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorrro Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 It's the latent hypocrisy that kills me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24hoursfromtulsehill Posted March 19, 2015 Author Share Posted March 19, 2015 (edited) It's the latent hypocrisy that kills me. Seriously. Would you rather have a hypocrisy-free world if it meant no one gave a :censored: about anyone else? (By the way, just to enhance your fury, I'm typing this while on taxpayer-sponsored facilities time.) Edited March 19, 2015 by 24hoursfromtulsehill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorrro Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 Seriously. Would you rather have a hypocrisy-free world if it meant no one gave a :censored: about anyone else? Seriously. Logical fallacies now. Typical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24hoursfromtulsehill Posted March 19, 2015 Author Share Posted March 19, 2015 Seriously. Logical fallacies now. Typical. Trust me. It's not a logical fallacy. (In that phrase, the word "logical" is redundant, but let's not get semantical.) My question is this: is it possible to be both self-interested and community-interested and avoid your charge of hypocrisy? If not, you've set people an impossible test (which incidentally is a type of fallacy). Welcome to my cold philosophical embrace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorrro Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 (let's not get semantical.) But you do it so well! In answer to your question: yes. I simply have my suspicions when it comes to your motives, which is where the real hypocrisy lies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24hoursfromtulsehill Posted March 19, 2015 Author Share Posted March 19, 2015 But you do it so well! In answer to your question: yes. I simply have my suspicions when it comes to your motives, which is where the real hypocrisy lies. I wanted a morning off and a chance to plot more persecution of the local HR community...whom I suspect of being the undead. None casts a shadow or shows a reflection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorrro Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 Well at least we can agree on something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted March 20, 2015 Share Posted March 20, 2015 A break is good. Stops the doxx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24hoursfromtulsehill Posted March 20, 2015 Author Share Posted March 20, 2015 A break is good. Stops the doxx. I hope so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous_Tic Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 You'll be back.Looks like I was right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24hoursfromtulsehill Posted March 11, 2016 Author Share Posted March 11, 2016 Looks like I was right Correct. I went back on it a couple of days ago for the first time in a year, with a view to using it to organise a certain upcoming stag-do. Another thing is I thought I'd deleted my account - as in obliterated it. I tried to set up an entirely new one but it said an account already existed with that email address. Lo and behold, I logged right back in to find everything there just as I left it. Scary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 Out of interest, do you feel you benefited from the break? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted March 11, 2016 Share Posted March 11, 2016 It made my Timehop weird, I couldn't see who I was having arguments with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24hoursfromtulsehill Posted March 14, 2016 Author Share Posted March 14, 2016 Out of interest, do you feel you benefited from the break? Yes. Massively. I think I understand it only after being away from it. It's completely ubiquitous among a certain demographic (I know enough younger people who stay away because it is the domain of their parents) and it's not easy to see it for what it is: a niche place on the internet where people go to advertise their lives, their pasts and their views. I still have no idea how it would ever make any money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Yes. Massively. I think I understand it only after being away from it. It's completely ubiquitous among a certain demographic (I know enough younger people who stay away because it is the domain of their parents) and it's not easy to see it for what it is: a niche place on the internet where people go to advertise their lives, their pasts and their views. I still have no idea how it would ever make any money. Advertising isn't it? a niche place on the internet where people go to advertise their lives, their pasts and their views. It's riddled with people - predominantly women (#comeatme it's true ) - who have a desperate need to constantly seek or cause offence, or both, publicly. They're missing that "off switch" that many of us use in real life for what we talk about & how we talk dependant on the company we're in... Even if you're not like that there's such a broad mix of people who read what you post you have to be so very careful with anything even resembling an opinion. Twitter on the other hand - I can rest easy(ish) knowing it's only fellow :censored: reading my :censored:e... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosa Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 It's riddled with people - predominantly women (#comeatme it's true ) - who have a desperate need to constantly seek or cause offence, or both, publicly. Uh huh. Sure. It's women who constantly cause offence on social media. That's why Bazza was skulking round the end of season demanding to know who rosa and underdog were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBosch Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Uh huh. Sure. It's women who constantly cause offence on social media. That's why Bazza was skulking round the end of season demanding to know who rosa and underdog were. I was talking more about the mundane Jeremy Kyle, minutiae of life type stuff rather than the Machiavellian antics of lower league football administrators.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.