Jump to content

Recommended Posts

People's frustrations are inevitable.

But, going forward, does the club need the fans to raise funds for frost covers (sure I read we only have ones that work to a couple of degrees minus) and anything that will help front of main stand.

Is this something the Trust could look into?

 

I'd possibly contribute to something essential like that rather than a scoreboard...

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 243
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

When did the club rip up the under soil heating and who's decision was it?

 

I don't think under soil heating is worth the cost these days. As far as yesterday goes it would have been a benefit, but on most occasions the surrounding area is deemed too dangerous, even if the pitch is playable. I remember going to Stoke once and the car park was a huge sheet of ice, and the game was on. These days that game would have been canceled before we set off..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why because it was Millwall? we played a team with fans probably further to travel.

Which map of England are you looking at lol !!! And I don't think played is the is the correct word.

Edited by oafc1955
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why because it was Millwall? we played a team with fans probably further to travel.

Bit of a geography malfunction there given Peterborough is about 90 miles north of London. I assume the poster means because of the risk of trouble. I don't believe that for a moment; certainly the ref would have had huge cause for disgruntlement as would the clubs and the players if a game had been played after a pitch had been deemed unfit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why because it was Millwall? we played a team with fans probably further to travel.

 

At the end of the day it was the referees decision. The ref at Bury may have deemed our pitch playable, after giving the groundsman time to sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd get here on the train quicker from Millwall than Peterborough, it depends how they've travelled.

 

Doubt that - you'd have to get across London to Euston first, and then it's over two hours to Manchester from there. Peterborough - Manchester by train is about 2 hour 30 mins, so even by train it'd be much of a muchness. By car Peterborough's much quicker.

 

 

...but it's all irrelevant really, anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go again. Zzzzz

Yep somebody should tell the club that fans listen to them but when they say 2 entirely different things about the same instance some fans are practised enough in textual criticism to .........

 

Self inflicted PR cock up about a self inflicted incident

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep somebody should tell the club that fans listen to them but when they say 2 entirely different things about the same instance some fans are practised enough in textual criticism to .........

 

Self inflicted PR cock up about a self inflicted incident

The game was off. Everyone is saying they believe pitch was fit in morning and would have been fit by kick off. Those are the main points.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The game was off. Everyone is saying they believe pitch was fit in morning and would have been fit by kick off. Those are the main points

 

But as always the devil is in the detail about which the club principals cannot even agree among themselves. In their desire to deflect attention from themselves and onto others they have come up with 2 different stories.

 

The main point is that club lost a game it was possible to save

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another point is I quite enjoyed my afternoon in the warm and cosy surroundings of my home watching Rugby Union and Horse Racing, and could next season become a permanent habit unless the club shapes itself.

I'd rather walk round Mossley with a nail in my boot than watch rugby union.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, keep it going. I'm loving the fact that something so blatantly :censored: by the club is still somehow being defended by McFluffer ???

My point is its :censored:ing gone. Done with. Can't be changed. Everyone thought game should be on apart from ref. Not everything is a huge :censored: up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the club manager and CEO giving different explanations of the same occurrence is a minor :censored: up then

Or maybe, just maybe Robbo had been on the pitch and CEO hadn't and there maybe was a small patch down that side. Maybe he told CEO that the pitch was frozen down side so he took it he meant whole side. Nobody :censored:ing knows but not many care because it's anot her thing to bitch at the club over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or maybe, just maybe Robbo had been on the pitch and CEO hadn't and there maybe was a small patch down that side. Maybe he told CEO that the pitch was frozen down side so he took it he meant whole side. Nobody :censored:ing knows but not many care because it's anot her thing to bitch at the club over.

You clearly care

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...