Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, deyres42 said:

So you agree a contract without demonstrating how you can pay for it?

 

An employment contract? Of course you can.  There is no requirement to prove it,  just a requirement to actually pay it. 

 

Are you saying that every football club must have funds set aside to show they can meet long term player/manager contracts?  Do they deposit the funds in an escrow account or something?  What the tell are you talking about?  

 

Even if a club had to do as you say, what is to stop them spending those funds on something else the day after?  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by kowenicki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lookersstandandy said:

 

....it doesn’t say review ‘interviews’, does it?

I've never heard anyone say review interviews after interviews. You'd say review candidates or review applications. 

 

He can't win at this stage either way. He'd likely have got hammered if someone was in the job within days because he'd rushed an appointment. Hes getting hammered off some because nobody in yet even though weve won 3 and drawn one as things stand. 

 

I'd rather we took our time and got the best. Even if that decision comes that PW has for the foreseeable future and take it as each game comes. If things are going wrong, change it. If not, leave it. 

 

If, as people suggest, the transfers are being made from up above, January doesn't matter...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

 

An employment contract? Of course you can.  There is no requirement to prove it,  just a requirement to actually pay it. 

 

Are you saying that every football club must have funds set aside to show they can meet long term player/manager contracts?  Do they deposit the funds in an escrow account or something?  What the tell are you talking about?  

 

Even if a club had to do as you say, what is to stop them spending those funds on something else the day after?  

 

 

 

 

 

 

In that case what's to stop us saying to a Championship manager for instance we will pay you triple what you are on now then two months later saying actually mate we can't afford that now, soz.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

In that case what's to stop us saying to a Championship manager for instance we will pay you triple what you are on now then two months later saying actually mate we can't afford that now, soz.

 

I would say there is nothing to stop us doing exactly that.

BUT if you were the interviewee wouldn't you want to know if it was feasible? In our clubs case you would say definitely not and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, whittles left foot said:

 

I would say there is nothing to stop us doing exactly that.

BUT if you were the interviewee wouldn't you want to know if it was feasible? In our clubs case you would say definitely not and move on.

Which is kind of my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

In that case what's to stop us saying to a Championship manager for instance we will pay you triple what you are on now then two months later saying actually mate we can't afford that now, soz.

 

Nothing would stop us doing that. What are you going on about? Why would we or anyone do that though?  We would be in breach of contract and he could sue us for the balance.

 

What planet are you speaking to us from?  I can’t believe what I’m reading. 

 

 

Edited by kowenicki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

 

Nothing would stop us doing that. What are you going on about? Why would we or anyone do that though?  We would be in breach of contract and he could sue us for the balance.

 

What planet are you speaking to us from?  I can’t believe what I’m reading. 

 

 

Well you wouldn't do it because you can't do it, unless you are happy to be in constant embargo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

I've never heard anyone say review interviews after interviews. You'd say review candidates or review applications. 

 

He can't win at this stage either way. He'd likely have got hammered if someone was in the job within days because he'd rushed an appointment. Hes getting hammered off some because nobody in yet even though weve won 3 and drawn one as things stand. 

 

I'd rather we took our time and got the best. Even if that decision comes that PW has for the foreseeable future and take it as each game comes. If things are going wrong, change it. If not, leave it. 

 

If, as people suggest, the transfers are being made from up above, January doesn't matter...

 

 

I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said.... it’s simply a curious choice of words by the hack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...