whittles left foot Posted November 24, 2021 Share Posted November 24, 2021 Report on The Fans Led Review pulled from The BBC. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59406087 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 11 hours ago, whittles left foot said: Report on The Fans Led Review pulled from The BBC. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59406087 Will it gather dust like many other reviews? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamoafc Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 23 minutes ago, BP1960 said: Will it gather dust like many other reviews? I genuinely believe this has a lot more meat on the bones this time round. It hasn’t been rushed and is putting a lot of pressure on the EFL to the point where they have now admitted it needs an independent regulator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 5 hours ago, adamoafc said: I genuinely believe this has a lot more meat on the bones this time round. It hasn’t been rushed and is putting a lot of pressure on the EFL to the point where they have now admitted it needs an independent regulator. True, but how often do we see government ministers change posts after a few months almost like football managers and previous plans ignored or shelved. Pressure needs to be applied on the government regularly so this doesn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamoafc Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_bro Posted November 27, 2021 Share Posted November 27, 2021 On 11/24/2021 at 10:28 PM, whittles left foot said: Report on The Fans Led Review pulled from The BBC. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59406087 This won't help get rid of AL. In fact it helps him out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tGWB Posted November 27, 2021 Share Posted November 27, 2021 Looking on the bright side of that game this afternoon Supporters shouldnt need any convincing about ‘emptying the Park’ My real concern is, what if those players today were actually giving it their very best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP1960 Posted November 27, 2021 Share Posted November 27, 2021 4 minutes ago, tGWB said: Looking on the bright side of that game this afternoon Supporters shouldnt need any convincing about ‘emptying the Park’ My real concern is, what if those players today were actually giving it their very best If the majority players are weak and faint hearted they arent going to change I'm afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamoafc Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 2 hours ago, adamoafc said: Haven't ALMO already tried this and it failed? Or is it something different? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamoafc Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 5 hours ago, the_mighty_bosh said: Haven't ALMO already tried this and it failed? Or is it something different? We believe it to be of a similar nature but we will clarify Never dull supporting Oldham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 Aren't the last two paragraphs a bit contradictory? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy b Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 2 hours ago, deyres42 said: Aren't the last two paragraphs a bit contradictory? Is that all you have to say? What about thank you for your efforts in looking out for fans’ interest etc? There is nothing contradictory in the paragraphs BTW. Don’t try and be a smart arse. It doesn’t suit you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy b Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 8 hours ago, the_mighty_bosh said: Haven't ALMO already tried this and it failed? Or is it something different? Thanks guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deyres42 Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 22 minutes ago, Andy b said: Is that all you have to say? What about thank you for your efforts in looking out for fans’ interest etc? There is nothing contradictory in the paragraphs BTW. Don’t try and be a smart arse. It doesn’t suit you The clowns are at it again, but let's not jump to conclusions. Seems pretty contradictory to me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 7 hours ago, adamoafc said: We believe it to be of a similar nature but we will clarify Never dull supporting Oldham Cheers Adam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_mighty_bosh Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 4 hours ago, Andy b said: Thanks guys ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
real Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 7 hours ago, adamoafc said: We believe it to be of a similar nature but we will clarify Never dull supporting Oldham I can't get my head around how this will even work... ALMO: We bought OACF, with a lease for 3 sides of the ground and the seating of the North stand, but we think we should own the North Stand in full. Blitz(/defendants?): Was the North Stand shown on the balance sheet as an asset when you did your due diligence? ALMO: No. Blitz(/defendants?): So it's not yours. We're done here. Regardless of whether the Corney/Blitz transfer of the asset from OAFC to Blitz was valid, I don't see how it can be ALMOs. Even the element that the council paid (£700k?) would not be an ALMO asset and might revert to the council. Even if ALMO could establish ownership of that part, it's only about 10% of the cost, and the actual value is now way lower than the construction cost (£7m?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 Has anyone seen the tweets that Barry Owen has sent out what a loser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaddyexile84 Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 5 minutes ago, GlossopLatic said: Has anyone seen the tweets that Barry Owen has sent out what a loser. I'm not too sure that account is actually Barry - it shares some consistencies with that other loser with about a million accounts ie: "sheep" and "the PTB" instead of just PTB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlossopLatic Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 28 minutes ago, Chaddyexile84 said: I'm not too sure that account is actually Barry - it shares some consistencies with that other loser with about a million accounts ie: "sheep" and "the PTB" instead of just PTB Mmmm yeah could be I'm not as twitter literate as some. If it is someone posing as Barry then thats absolutely awful to mud sling in his name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Og Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 20 minutes ago, GlossopLatic said: Mmmm yeah could be I'm not as twitter literate as some. If it is someone posing as Barry then thats absolutely awful to mud sling in his name. I'm not sure that the words 'twitter' and 'literate' belong in the same sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteG Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 2 hours ago, real said: I can't get my head around how this will even work... ALMO: We bought OACF, with a lease for 3 sides of the ground and the seating of the North stand, but we think we should own the North Stand in full. Blitz(/defendants?): Was the North Stand shown on the balance sheet as an asset when you did your due diligence? ALMO: No. Blitz(/defendants?): So it's not yours. We're done here. Regardless of whether the Corney/Blitz transfer of the asset from OAFC to Blitz was valid, I don't see how it can be ALMOs. Even the element that the council paid (£700k?) would not be an ALMO asset and might revert to the council. Even if ALMO could establish ownership of that part, it's only about 10% of the cost, and the actual value is now way lower than the construction cost (£7m?) The council paid far more than the 700k. There was 2 separate grants plus the purchase of the Lancaster club and they money element is somewhat irrelevant. The council stipulated that the club couldn't dispose of the stand in any way until at least 2031. You do know AL when he took the club on took on the debts including the debenture to Brassbank? If the asset belongs to the club that's where it will be returned to. The owner is not relevant. However, it might help us as a football club attract a buyer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
real Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 43 minutes ago, PeteG said: The council paid far more than the 700k. There was 2 separate grants plus the purchase of the Lancaster club and they money element is somewhat irrelevant. The council stipulated that the club couldn't dispose of the stand in any way until at least 2031. You do know AL when he took the club on took on the debts including the debenture to Brassbank? If the asset belongs to the club that's where it will be returned to. The owner is not relevant. However, it might help us as a football club attract a buyer. Does ALMO think he (I'm treating them an a single entity) actually purchased the stand? I'd assume that the debenture was formally included in the sale, the balance sheet was provided and liability for debts arising after the balance sheet date also formed part of the sale? If the stand wasn't in the sale then it would rest with Corney or the council might (if the relevant clause exists) be able to dispute possession. If I own a piece of land, which has a specific designation (let's call it BP) but then I split part of "BP" off and give it away for free, if I then sell the reduced size "BP" to someone else, with the deeds only including the smaller "BP", why would they think they owned a historic disposal? If another party had an interest in the bit I split off, they could raise a case, but not the new owner of the revised "BP". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticMark Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 2 hours ago, Chaddyexile84 said: I'm not too sure that account is actually Barry - it shares some consistencies with that other loser with about a million accounts ie: "sheep" and "the PTB" instead of just PTB . . . and there's more: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.