oafc 123 118 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 6 minutes ago, deyres42 said: Have the Bantams even got a permanent manager yet? Be a shitter for Rowe if the new custodian comes in and doesn't fancy him... Stuart McCall signed a new deal just before they played us in the FA Cup. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 6 minutes ago, OneSizeFitz said: Dearnley I can believe (he's scored about ten and can't have played more than about thirty games). The other two, would love to see your maths... umm ..so Dearnley has scored 10 and can’t have played more than 30? Isn’t that better than 1 in 3 MacAleny 36 in 90 starts Grant 81 in 305 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kev1969 30 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 hours ago, bigfatjoe1 said: Well we got shit defense shit midfield and now shit forward line well do e our wonderful owners..What will kewell say if we go down on last day and Rowe scores goal that takes us down. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kev1969 30 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 If we are relying on grant and blackwood say no more Quote Link to post Share on other sites
OneSizeFitz 226 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, Sheep Foot said: umm ..so Dearnley has scored 10 and can’t have played more than 30? Isn’t that better than 1 in 3 MacAleny 36 in 90 starts Grant 81 in 305 Yeah, that's why I said I could believe that one. Interesting approach to consider all goals, but only divide by the number of starts... Conveniently ignoring all the sub appearances and goals scored in those. By that reckoning, Rowe's got 11 in 25 for us. Not too shabby. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 12 minutes ago, latics22 said: Yeah he did pretty much all his career keep up Rowe at Oxford? Which college ? Magdalen? More like OxfordBrookes I would think? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 1 minute ago, OneSizeFitz said: Yeah, that's why I said I could believe that one. Interesting approach to consider all goals, but only divide by the number of starts... Conveniently ignoring all the sub appearances and goals scored in those. By that reckoning, Rowe's got 11 in 25 for us. Not too shabby. He didn’t start 25 league though did he ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
OneSizeFitz 226 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Just now, Sheep Foot said: He didn’t start 25 league though did he ? Okay, so 7 in 19 in the league if that's all you want to consider. Still not too shabby. ...and still doesn't make your maths any less ridiculous. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 1 minute ago, OneSizeFitz said: Okay, so 7 in 19 in the league if that's all you want to consider. Still not too shabby. ...and still doesn't make your maths any less ridiculous. So 7 in19 at the age of 31 and a transfer to to the 87th team in the football league ....I must be missing somethindpg Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ShireBlue 282 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Sheep Foot said: I must be missing something No doubt about that 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 10 minutes ago, OneSizeFitz said: Yeah, that's why I said I could believe that one. Interesting approach to consider all goals, but only divide by the number of starts... Conveniently ignoring all the sub appearances and goals scored in those. By that reckoning, Rowe's got 11 in 25 for us. Not too shabby. Oh and he hasn’t scored 11 league either has he ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, ShireBlue said: No doubt about that What am I missing ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
OneSizeFitz 226 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 3 minutes ago, Sheep Foot said: Oh and he hasn’t scored 11 league either has he ? No, which is why when you asked for figures in the league I gave them as 7 in 19. Do keep up... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 24 minutes ago, OneSizeFitz said: Yeah, that's why I said I could believe that one. Interesting approach to consider all goals, but only divide by the number of starts... Conveniently ignoring all the sub appearances and goals scored in those. By that reckoning, Rowe's got 11 in 25 for us. Not too shabby. That clearly says 11 in 25 ......he hasn’t scored 11 and he hasn’t started 25 league games but don’t let that worry you Quote Link to post Share on other sites
OneSizeFitz 226 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, Sheep Foot said: That clearly says 11 in 25 ......he hasn’t scored 11 and he hasn’t started 25 league games but don’t let that worry you 23 minutes ago, OneSizeFitz said: Okay, so 7 in 19 in the league if that's all you want to consider. Still not too shabby. ...and still doesn't make your maths any less ridiculous. Anyway, I'm bored of this argument. Enjoy your evening! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
League one forever 1,298 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 I wish BCD would come back, he was a right laugh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Magic Mikey 1,766 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Please stop replying to Magister's trolling. Just leave him festering alone in his minority of one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 1 minute ago, League one forever said: I wish BCD would come back, he was a right laugh. Enjoying myself....I don’t rate Rowe particularly but surprised a team like Latics can think we don’t need him. £10 each to charity ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Just now, Magic Mikey said: Please stop replying to Magister's trolling. Just leave him festering alone in his minority of one. I am not trolling I am challenging perceptions and misconceptions ...tongue in cheek. We are 16th in the bottom division and I am fed up with that and people telling me have good pkayers Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 7 minutes ago, OneSizeFitz said: Anyway, I'm bored of this argument. Enjoy your evening! I have Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mcfluff1985 1,260 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 What an absolute try hard... also rhymes with ret... nah I won't say it... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lookersstandandy 1,944 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 hours ago, oafcmetty said: I hear Salford are keen on Bahamboula. Inevitable really. Didn’t Wellens have him on trial at Swindon and say no? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheep Foot 361 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said: What an absolute try hard... also rhymes with ret... nah I won't say it... Never been a more appropriate time to describe you as a bantamweight Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guy Branston Pickle 135 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 25 minutes ago, Sheep Foot said: I am not trolling I am challenging perceptions and misconceptions ...tongue in cheek. We are 16th in the bottom division and I am fed up with that and people telling me have good pkayers We do have some good players, for this level. The problem is they're surrounded by a lot of very shit players. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Luis Enrique 93 Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Beyond fed up with this total shit show. But biting my tongue for now. If Rowe is replaced by a better player then we’re headed in the right direction. If he’s replaced by a worse player then we’re going even further backwards. Let’s see what you got Mo. Anything? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.