Jump to content

Harry Dowds Green Shirt

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    1,324
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Harry Dowds Green Shirt

  1. The question is.

     

    Would you be happy to pay an extra 96p to the cost of your match ticket what ever it is, if the money was donated to the JFT96 Appeal?

     

     

    Not only would this be fantastic PR for the club, it would be another way for the appeal to keep in the public eye and for all fans attending to help in a small way.

    Thanks for that rick. It wont help with the queues though all that change having to be dished out

     

    Noble idea though

  2. It was suggested last season by someone to open a few turnstiles and have people come through them and pay on an early morning, tell people before hand to have the right change and bingo an easy and quick way to sell tickets and can have say 8 turnstiles open so less queues for all

     

    No No and No again. Sorry but that is a disaster waiting to happen and will casue more peoblems than it will solve.

     

    This is not like last season, we have three weeks to sell the tickets plus the benefit of a home game this Saturday. There is plenty of time and therefore there are unlikely to be long queues this time

  3. The game v Liverpool is undoubtedly going to be a sell out, but what is the most effective method of selling tickets to people. Last year was quite a cock up and due to the limitation of the amount Liverpool will be allocated will be mean Liverpool fans will come over and buy tickets in the home section. The club need to make this game as fair as possible and despite not being a season ticket holder myself anymore, I still feel they deserve priority. Thus, the question is to be asked what is the best method of sales. Personally, the method of opening the sales to season ticket holders is priority giving them the option of one extra ticket per season ticket and or two extra if they hold a stub from the forest game. The club should then bring in a promotional offer allowing those who go to the Brentford game priority tickets along with those who still hold a forest game stub and offer them priority tickets . This then prioritises those who are season holders, went to the forest game and go to the Brentford game and most likely sell majority home tickets. After this depending on the amount left, open them up to general sales selling the remaining until full capacity. Please give other models of sales

     

    I disagree. Last year was not a cock up.

  4. We've previously had to cordon off a number of seats between the large and small sections and if this happened we'd be chucking money away. If this doesn't have to happen then happy days, let's keep the big bit for us.

     

    As has been suggested on another thread, put vouchers on the gate for the Brentford game. If nothing else it will give us an indication of demand from the home fans. I appreciate that we have a number of exiled fans but they are small in number compared to those who live locally.

     

    Will be a cat A game so will be fully policed in any event so unlikely to be no need to cordon off seats

  5. I wouldn't say I have any superior knowledge of building things (at all). But I do know that I sat in the thing.

     

    They might have made a loss on it though. If I remember rightly, the game was televised subject to Chasetown playing at home, and them not moving it to a nearby bigger ground. For them to play at home they had to erect the stands. So the TV money probably made it worthwhile.

     

    Exactly and if ESPN/ITV said the same then that may make a difference but for a club like us without that insentive, it initially appears to not make sense but watch this space as they say

  6. No, they've come out and said there won't be standing, not seating.

    This is a discussion board and whilst I repsect your opinion, there are things that go on in the background that dont always come out into the open and which you wouldn't be aware of. I am aware there are already discussions going on behind the scenes about this already and that is what I am referring to.

  7. Splitting the RRE will lose us money due to segregation issues.

     

    If giving Liverpool the Chaddy is an option, I'd do that. Otherwise, get your Thermos' at the ready you non-season ticket scum. Mwahhahaha!

     

    Why would you give Liverpool the Chaddy instead of the large section of the RRE. Chaddy holds 3,500 and the large section of the RRE 3,000.

     

    In any case that will not happen full stop.

  8. There's probably money to be made, but not that much.

     

    Even with a monster 5,000 seat thing you'd gross £100k, allowing for kids prices etc. Deduct the cost, half the proceeds and what's left?

     

    The lookers paddock only held 1200 seats so thats the maximum you would get in now. at £20 per tichet take off vat and an allowance for kids & oap's and you average will be £13 giving income of £15,600. We cannot deduct this cost from the takings as a match cost and so will only keep 40% of that figure or around £6,200. You cant put 1200 temp seats in for that so the club would lose money.

     

    Sorry this wont happen

  9. The worst part about today is losing Dux. From when Warnock signed him until his last game for us he was our Mr Reliable. Wholehearted, determined and a players player. A captain and leader of men (and boys)

     

    He was also a team man and when PD took over stepped up on match days to do the analysis watching the opposition and noting down any change of tactics (now thats a proper use of a clipboard) and passing that information to the manager to decide if he needed to counter. Over the last 2 and a half years watching the ressies, you can see the calm way he has cajoled his troops wanting to help get bthe players ready for 1st team action. As I say a team man.

     

    If thers's 1 person unlucky today it's Lee Duxbury. Good luck for the future Lee and thank you for your efforst over the years. I hope you get fixed up somewhere soon.

  10. The backroom setup has clearly been wrong for some time and needed re-organising. Making Butler a coach instead of the sports science work that he was specifically brought in to do made no sense and was a waste of money the club doesn't have. It also smacks of jobs for mates and was in no ones best interest except Butler. What good is that to OAFC?

     

    The structure Dickov wanted in place when he came was

     

    Manager

    Assistant

    Sports scientist/fitness coach

    1st team coach/Reserve team manager

    Goalkeeping coach

     

    That is a bloated setup imho for a league 1 team with a small budget but he was backed all the way.

     

    To then do away with the fitmess side of things and use that member of staff as a coach (or as he has become known clipboard man) makes no sense.

×
×
  • Create New...