Guys,
Don't want to say too much or get involved in a debate on here as, because of my position, I don't think it would a professional thing to do.
However, in the interests of clarifying this for everyone, read my article again more closely. You will see towards the bottom three pars that I clearly state that the traffic report carried out by the council officers - about the impact on the surrounding roads - was attached to the reports on the application which all planning commitee members received back in October.
A clerical error just meant it wasn't attached to the main agenda paperwork for last Wednesday, so it was simply re-attached onto the late list at 4pm. It was not, however, 'new'. They'd had it since October.
Carl Marsden