Jump to content

frizzell54

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    767
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by frizzell54

  1. 16 hours ago, rudemedic said:

     

    Personally as someone who no longer has a source for any of the gossip at the club I’m glad that we have someone who knows someone in a different organisation to provide some of the gossip. If all we had was someone who spends their time in the local gym, who let’s not forget used to make stuff up on a regular basis on here, then it would be pretty dull and we wouldn’t have half the info we do.

     

    Whatever the solution is, to be sniping at people for posting something in good faith that turns out to be wrong 24 hours later is not productive.

     

     

    Not my experience of the person alluded to.

     

    I draw your attention to your latter clause.

  2. On 9/22/2018 at 11:19 PM, BP1960 said:

     

    I thought Hunt  on the far post was weak for the first corner. I've noticed that with him in other games. George had a good game apart from a couple of occasions when he should have cleared the ball.

    He's coming on leaps and bounds IMO and I'm sure higher clubs will looking at him now.

     

     

    Far post?  No one on the far post when every corner actually taken by Colchester.  We were lucky not to conceed another one possibly two.  This seems to be the new way of defending.  Just asks for trouble as far as I can see (yes I know I am old fashioned)!

     

    By the way I would like one on the front post as well and I would like keepers to come out and catch the odd cross too.

  3. 13 hours ago, pk200 said:

    42,000 v Liverpool  FA Cup early 1960's

     

    12 hours ago, BP1960 said:

     

    I was there too,  RRE.

    Lost 2-1 to what turned out to be a great Liverpool team.

     

    Me too.  4 January 1962, 41,733 and barriers gave way in the Chaddy.

     

    2 : 1 to Liverpool, Johnny Colquhoun our scorer.  Plus an Oldham goal not dissimilar to Englands world cup goal of '66 disallowed for Oldham.  I think our cross bar was round in those days Jack Rowley had it changed to oval cross section for the following season (this may be myth of course).

     

    Ian St John scored Liverpool's, this was the start of the Liverpool era with Shankly as manager.  Liverpool wer division 2 then I think going up as champions.

     

    Happy days.

  4. The fact is that most of the players of league 1 quality have gone (yes, they should have kept us up) and we have replaced with league 2 quality players (or less), so to get out of this league a point away and 3 at home must be the aim.  We do not have enough quality to rip up this league, so a point last night is ok, particularly at a ground where we have a poor record (yes I do think that is important).

     

    Before the usual suspects start, no I am not a happy clapper.  In fact I am very unhappy about the club's situation.

  5. 6 minutes ago, Wardie said:

    I don't agree. France were cagey and crap, in my opinion, until Croatia gifted them the penalty...or should I say VR and the referee. I enjoyed the game though and thought France played much better after their second goal...as I think most international teams of any reasonable quality would. On the plus side, it was one of the better WC finals I have seen in a long time.

     

    I don't think it is fair to compare mental strength and fitness within different sporting disciplines. 

     

    Fair reasoned comment, I just got fed up with the mindless tosh spoken about tennis.   It is a tough sport you are involved in every point and game points, set points and match points can be akin to a penalty shoot out, there's no where to hide.  Whereas in a well contested football match the outfield players will only have an average of about four and a half minutes possession in the whole game, yes I know there is supposed to be a lot of running off the ball (well we hope to see it even at Latics).

     

    It is too easy to write off sports that one knows nothing about.

     

  6. 10 minutes ago, Magic Mikey said:

    Is this the game where they have to sit down for a little rest and a drink every few minutes?

     

    7 minutes ago, latics22 said:

    Tennis isn’t as intense as football your don’t have to run 90 odd yards slow fast, slow fast, track back, slow fast, bursts of pace

     

    4 minutes ago, Monty Burns said:

    Love this. Tennis is fuckin shit. 

     

    4 minutes ago, daniel said:

    Tennis is shit. Football isn’t. That’s the biggest difference.

     

    Wisdom from those who have never played the game seriously.

     

    Football:  2 matches in a week is too much, when 10 others plus subs take the strain.  Don't make me laugh!

  7. 1 hour ago, frizzell54 said:

    Sorry folks, but England are light years behind France, Croatia and Belgum.  There is one positive though, looks as if we have found a keeeper.  

     

    With regard to the tennis, the top pros. are far superior athletically and in mental strength to any footballer.

     

     

     

    Expected down vote from usual snowflake.

×
×
  • Create New...