Jump to content

Crusoe

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    5,247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Crusoe

  1. OpenOffice - free office suite, replaces Microsoft Office, almost entirely compatible with Word and Excel, also prints PDFs

    Google Earth - photos of anywhere in the world, needs broadband connection

    Trillian - combines MSN Messenger, Yahoo! Messenger and AIM in one program

    VLC Media Player - free DVD playing software, not region-coded, great all-round media player

    Tweak UI Power Toy - lets you fiddle with hidden XP settings

    Ad Aware Personal - same as Spybot, I run both anti spyware programs together

    Windows Defender - ditto, free anti spyware software from Microsoft

    K Lite Codec Pack - decoders for all movie & music file types, plus Real Alternative and Media Player Classic to replace bloated XP software

     

    And if you download Firefox (listed above) there are some excellent add-ons for it:

     

    Ad Block Plus - filters banners and Flash ads, even Google text ads, from web pages

    No Script - blocks all scripts and executable content from web pages unless you allow them

    IE Tab - runs IE in a Firefox page, so you can open pages that don't like Firefox

    Mouse Gestures - navigate the web in Firefox using combinations of mouse movements

  2. Couple of quick thoughts on that:

     

    How do you fairly and accurately decide which ones can't be rehabilitated at some point in their lives?

     

    How do you make sure that they are truly guilty? The idea of "safety of others" is counterbalanced by the worry that someone will accidentally or deliberately be wrongfully executed. I mean, it's not like we have a great record of that in this country!

     

    I do understand the frustration with the current system, and it is in bad shape, but I'd be the first out of the country if we moved to a system where we make a quick decision on whether someone is worth rehabilitating or just killing, and hope that that we're right.

  3. I think it is wrong for a state to kill a person for breaking the laws that the state has set...

     

    I think it is hypocritical to kill a murderer as it is commiting the same act as the person is being punished for. When it comes to kiddy-fiddlers and rapists, the other great taboos of our society I am swayed by the argument that if you assign the death penalty to these offences then it makes the offender less likely to keep the victim alive...

     

    I reject the deterent argument for several reasons such as no criminal ever thinks they will get caught, hence they still commit crimes..etc..

     

    Capital punishment usually ends up as retribution rather than justice...

     

    And:

     

    The solution being, don't release them, in my opinion. Like BT, I disagree with the state not abiding by it's own laws. And, harsh as it may sound, I don't like hearing victims' opinions - of course many will support the death penalty, but they can't be objective, can they?

     

    And:

     

    Absolutely agree that victim's families should have no input in sentencing - makes it less of a crime to kill a miserable old git who smelt and was hated by everyone than someone whose mother loved them - not right.

     

    I'm not used to seeing this much sense posted on a football forum! Excellent stuff beag_teeets, Stevie_J and leeslover.

  4. I still reckon Hall will be out at the end of the season - definitely if we go up, probably if we're still here.

     

    He's not really had much of a chance to get a run of form in the first team, it's true, but in 45-odd appearances (mostly as a sub) he still hasn't really looked the part. A loan out is probably his best chance to impress.

×
×
  • Create New...