real

I'm not sure you can simeoultaneously claim that the entire ground including the NS is worth less than £3m but at the same time claim that the NS is worth more than the £3.6m Blitz put in....

Unless you believe that things are valued at their total cost...

So club bought for £2m (?) and spend £3-4m = £6m valuation and at the same time NS cost £7m, so must be worth £7m.

Both ignore "value in use" and "value at sale", so ignore accounting practice. But AL seems to have advocated that from the start (see Shahed's mention of publishing 2018 as per Management Instruction)

If a new owner wants to purchase the ground from Brassbank, what happens to any money raised?

If a future owner wants to purchase the ground from "The 1895 fund", what happens to the fee paid?

both a bit hypothetical, but both are realistic (imho)

On 9/13/2021 at 10:40 PM, Bristolatic said:

But doesn't give us much Comfort

There was a bleach of contract

Is it just the 2 of them? Can you confirm the exact number for us please

No, you're in there too. You've spent an entire thread telling people to ask for specifics and then come on this one Trolling the fact that I asked for something specific. Typical of you, a rank hypocrite with no dignity. You're only on here as a disruptor.

It's laughable that bosch complains to the trust about the club not being able to host a kids party, which the trust can't control, but thinks I'm wrong to ask a question.

You can add whichever trust board member went complaining to Simon Brooke that I was "sniping" at the trust too.

That pretty much puts this board and the Trust in the category of useless, so I'm out.

As for the football it's crap and the marginal improvement hasn't convinced me to renew my 2 STs so it'll be picking and choosing games from now on.

Done.

Some might say no more pathetic than coming on a football forum and never talking about the football...

No,YOU might say that because you are following me like a sad moron. Anyway there's no point in this forum any more. Anything I do post is latched onto by you 2 and results in personal attacks and gets dragged off topic.

You 2 are part of the reason this place is so :censored:.

You 2 are just a little bit obsessed with me. Pathetic really. It's not as if the trust has gone from strength to strength.

Hmm, why would the club hire someone who was known for attempting to dupe fans?

Maybe that's the skill set they wanted.

And then sacked him when they realised it wouldn't work.

I had to go Scotland for work.

 

It doesn't make me hypocritical. The ones I've called are the ones who complain about the club and how the meeting was structured yet didn't go themselves

Yeah, maybe some of them had to work? Only difference is they have a different opinion to you, so you then call people wankers. Sums you up. It's not as if you made the effort to attend, but you like to act as though you can write their opinions.

No

I thought you'd said that you would attend?

Whatever your viewpoint, to say you'd attend and then not do so makes it a bit hypocritical to call others who didn't attend.

Said he wasn't going to post on here anymore and who can blame him?

 

Tried doing something to get answers for the fans then just got a load of :censored: off little wankers who didn't even go

You went didn't you?

Where had this £150 come from all of a sudden? It was £200.

 

Point still stands though.

It wasn't £200.

Every single one was prepared to pay, and handed over a full £350.

Perhaps people need to remember that fact. Maybe those who wish to pay £15 should have to pay £25 and then get £10 back if we win?

Non ST holders whining about people who committed £350 at the end of Feb should shut up.

Hasty? Been planned for weeks.

He joined on 9th July, the first friendly was a week later on 16th August.

Ok rapunzel ;-)

Carry on down the pan

Bore off. He answered the questions.

Shut up you hypocritical lickspittle

Good job it wasn't filmed, people might have seen moiseys strings

 

I want real to get to ask the first question and then to leave immediately once it doesn't get answered.....

 

He's like a one man single issue political party

If you think the trust is working, carry on sniping at me, although I don't think I've posted anything on that level for months. It was a test question to see if I could get an answer to show how much the trust board care if fans are engaged or not.

They never respond. There's no point joining an organisation that should be driven by getting membership numbers up if it doesn't care.

That trust fans Forum planned last June is still awaited too.

And the scoreboard that they've thrown back to the guy who :censored:s everything up.

Chalk up another nonsuccess and start a bit more in-fighting

Notts County doubled Sheridan's salary, he wanted to stay but we couldn't match his offer. He might be regretting it now but that is why he left 100%.

I wont go into details but my source is bullet proof.

No proof there.

I happen to know that they trebled his salary, gave him a new car and arranged for him to spend every Friday having a threesome with Jennifer Lawrence and Jennifer Aniston.

And he gets 3 bags of sweets every week

Just worth noting that there's at least one other Alex wild who follows Latics

I'd pack the idea in NNN. You'll just get stick off some bellend regardless of what you do.

Always a pathetic insult from you. You're the one that uses "tone" to have a go at people you don't agree with. Anyway I thought you wanted to go to the meeting? So why suggest packing it in? Are you bottling out?

nnn, is this just a temporary thing? A meeting could be held pre match another day in a pub, depending on numbers?

As in the movie 'Oliver' with food...MORE!!!.

Goals, glorious goals...

Shots, toe-pokes and headers..

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ex-rangers-chairman-craig-whyte-disqualified-as-a-director-for-15-years

Hmm,failed to consult other directors correctly.

Looks like that £200k pocketed by Corney + cronies was a waste of money.

Yes, I can count.

 

It seems very disrespectful to Jimmy and his family to say that they are naming the stand after him and then do nothing to evidence it.

You expect the club to do something tangible? That might involve spending money?

They'll do a fans appeal and put up a sign in 2018.

Maybe as SC pointed out its far from being an abnormal situation to be, in owing money to other clubs, and everyone just gets on with it knowing lower league teams can't always pay bills on time

If our situation is normal, and clubs normally accept it, is there something that's made them react differently this time?

The level of debt owed? Frequency of it happening? Multiple creditors?