razza699 Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) Just readin that Taylor is ready for the Boro game, it also says 21 year old striker I think 22 year old winger is more fitting . Taylor fit Edited July 28, 2009 by razza699 Quote
ste1987 Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 Just readin that Taylor is ready for the Boro game, it also says 21 year old striker I think 22 year old winger is more fitting . Taylor fit The journalism on the website in recent weeks has been shocking. Quote
danny88 Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 Wasnt Taylor classed as a striker when he was around 17/18, but then trained into a winger? Quote
ste1987 Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 Wasnt Taylor classed as a striker when he was around 17/18, but then trained into a winger? Was a striker in the reserves and winger in first team. As Razza says, Winger is more fitting. Quote
razza699 Posted July 28, 2009 Author Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) Wasnt Taylor classed as a striker when he was around 17/18, but then trained into a winger? He is still 22 though also typo in the Smalley article on the OS Sqaud Edited July 28, 2009 by razza699 Quote
danny88 Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 (edited) yeah, just a shame that smalley isnt quite the player taylor is. Edited July 28, 2009 by danny88 Quote
astottie Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 Just readin that Taylor is ready for the Boro game, it also says 21 year old striker I think 22 year old winger is more fitting . Taylor fit I'm more concerned that Reubs is fit and classes as a defender! Quote
rosa Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 The journalism on the website in recent weeks has been shocking. Yeah, i still think it's more likely that Taylor's messed with space-time continuum to be 21 again, than Gregan actually being 13 and a half stone. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.