Lincoln Blue Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 With all the media stating that only 2 Liverpool players were over the age of 23, what are the ages of the latics players from yesterday? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshOWTB Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 Not sure how much you can rely on the Dailymail to be correct but: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lincoln Blue Posted January 28, 2013 Author Share Posted January 28, 2013 So we had 4 players over the age of 24. Hardly a big difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manshaw Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 So we had 4 players over the age of 24. Hardly a big difference. average age 23. Lets look at the cost of the team against Liverpool= no comparison. Get over it Liverpool you were sh--- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewBlue Posted January 28, 2013 Share Posted January 28, 2013 Call me sad for calculating it but we had an average of 23.8 however, I used Winchester's age because he was on for 85 minutes rather than M'Changama. Also, our substitutes were obviously way younger and less experienced than Liverpool's. There's another statistic that proves how good we were and disproves ANOTHER Liverpool excuse. Next it'll be the flare distracted them before the game.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.