mad4it

3 minutes ago, singe said:

But then a little carrot...
THey must know the implications by n ow though, he was interested last time.

 

 

And the killer quote .....

 

All we can do is wait and see , but the manager of wales, a academy direct and the manager of England ladies are ever going to have a conflict of interest with Salford City , so please stop clutching at straws . 

39 minutes ago, yarddog73 said:

Macclesfield battered us Saturday and let's be honest the ref did us a favour on more than one occasion, cannot go to Donny with them same personal expecting any sort of result.

Not got a choice really Maouche is suspended , Gardner , Fane , Coke Injured , Baxter not fully match fit, so the midfield virtually names itselfs

 O’Grady, Benteke not fit, Duffus on the naughty step, Lang and Branger likely to start in midfield, which means we leave Vera upfront on his own .

potentially we can make a couple of changes in defence , but hunt is likely to start in place of Maouche anyway and Taylors’s been poor in his last 3 or 4 games, so unless Wild plays the young lads , we are stuck with the cr.p turned out on Saturday!!!

3 minutes ago, maximus1267 said:

Make Saturday a big thank you to Mr wild instead, latics fan who has had the balls to step up and be counted when all around him was in chaos.

Send him off in style knowing that a new era will begin next week. He will still be part of the club but from a safer position for his own security.

Be the 12th man and push the team over the line. I'm sure he would really love to step down in style ready for his hand over to scholes.

I'm sure if the scholes thing wasn't a goer it would have been leaked or quashed by now. 

Let scholes prepare us for utd in the 5th round.

Hopefully, the players that let him(Pete Wild) and us (the fans) down badly on Saturday will actually step up to the mark and prove they’re not a shower of s..te after all (but I won’t be holding my breathe) its the very least he deserves and decency to apologise to the fans for the p..s poor performance, which can’t be said about the players !!!!!

47 minutes ago, rudemedic said:

You are aware that missing is a yes/no outcome. You either miss or you don't. 

 

He didn't, he scored. He had more goals for Oldham than Duffus, despite starting the same number of competitive games. 

And are you aware that the lone striker up front isn’t working, you only have to look

at the bench for the past few games to realise that we need more options up front , Vera clearly isn’t match fit, clearly needs to adjust to the pace and physical nature of the 4th division and other than us who else in league 1 and 3 are scouring the lower European (mainly French) leagues find players ... !!

1 minute ago, rudemedic said:

Vera has scored more goals for Oldham. 

 

IIRC Duffus took a penalty in a pre-season friendly and missed. 

And Vera took a penalty against Macclesfield and almost missed , other than that I can’t even remember him having another attempt on goal (let alone a shot on target) !!!!!

15 minutes ago, astottie said:

Bet it's the trust's fault if one doesn't. I'm interested that some people seem to be carrying a torch for Surridge still and as yet he hasn't gone anywhere else on loan. 8 days to go, fingers crossed. 

“The lady doth protest too much, methinks “ 

2 minutes ago, underdog said:

You can only give people enough rope and all.....like I said we are 12 months in of slowly, slowly....there is only so much slowly, slowly you can do before legal requirements should be met

Slowly, Slowly, you’re beginning to sound like Lemsagam 

3 minutes ago, underdog said:

Why should we? its not the Trust position to dispell or confirm "club news"...the club should have their own marketing/publicity team and we are not it.

 

Yes the Trust statement released on behalf of the club is.....

 

And why shouldn’t you, I thought the trust were meant to protect the interest of the fans ... 

4 minutes ago, Lee Sinnott said:

Get an evening organised with Frankie Bunn. He'll tell you...

Or with Davies, Gerrard or Byrne , sure they all have stories to tell ? 

1 minute ago, underdog said:

I know...for a newbie he/she is proper wading in...nowt wrong with it. Just wondering why they are very anti...

I’m not anti or pro the tryst to be honest, but I went to the trust meeting at the start of the season (were Corney was virtual accused of stealing) and told of the new era , but nothing’s changed 

7 minutes ago, underdog said:

we don't comment on employer/employee issues. Its private and the rep is not on the board yet as there is no board to be voted onto anyway. 

 

What do you class as communication?

 

 

 

Communication - the imparting or exchanging of information by speaking, writing, or using some other medium. 

22 minutes ago, jorvik_latic said:

 

Read the post above for your 'eagerly awaited' response. Why you've put that, I don't know.

You said I was so wrong , regarding the trust and it’s lack of communication, so I was awaiting your evidence to the contrary 

3 minutes ago, underdog said:

wow...i have an interest in protecting mu volunteer postion.

 

Barry made waves.....doors closed.... what do you consider difficult questions?

Barry made waves , you could have fooled me , examples would be nice ! 

As for the questions, asked or not , no one ever knows because the trust don’t publish minutes of their (or your) meetings , which is a trait of organisations like the Freemasons ... 

1 minute ago, jorvik_latic said:

 

I meant with regards to joining the board of the Trust.

 

The Trust can't promise that - they can't force AL to communicate more. They can recommend it but can't force it.

No the can’t , be the can at least ask the questions and release statements regarding the behind the scenes going on at BP, at the moment we are relying on the odd (negative) press leak reported by Mike Keegan 

13 minutes ago, jorvik_latic said:

 

So, so wrong.

Read the post above for my response, eagerly awaiting your evidence?

Then give me the proof, when Rhodes was sacked , the trust  couldn’t issue a statement because , the trust representative on the oafc board was on holiday and on that point when was the last statement from the trust issued (on any subject ). 

The meeting I went to promised more open , honest and transparent communication between the club and the fans ... that clearly hasn’t happened.

Firstly what would be the he point when the organisation has an obvious, don’t rock the board at policy. 

Secondly, I’d need to get voted on to the board which clearly wouldn’t happen because it would mean one of the other board members giving up their coverted position!!! 

28 minutes ago, rudemedic said:

AL isn't going to let him go without a replacement lined up (same for Benteke). 

 

Vera has scored more goals than Duffus. 

 

I really think you are over thinking things. If Duffus plays for us he can't then play for anyone else, this season. It is in his interests to not play for us, no matter how good he is. 

Not really, by the time we sign a new manager, the transfer window will be closed, so they’ll be no need to move players on. As for Vera scoring more goals than Duffus, he’s 8 years older so is bound to have scored more goals , he’s also played for 19 other clubs during his senior career, so hasn’t actually set the football world alight , but the point is Vera is clearly a signing influenced by Lemsagam as opposed to Bunn, Wild or Scholes (should he become our new manager) 

On 1/21/2019 at 10:49 AM, Lee Sinnott said:

I asked these questions at the Trust meeting in the summer and was told by the Trust Rep at the time that everything would be ok and Abdallah will learn from his mistakes, wouldn't be signing players without the managers permission and wouldn't be interfering with team selection. Six months on, and it is still happening...

Come on let’s face it, the trust (at the moment) are s pointless organisation, too many of the board are more interested protecting the status of their position rather than making waves , I also went to the summer meeting which promised a bright new future of openness and honesty, which has turned out to be hollow words , and not one of them has had the balls to ask the difficult questions to Lemsagam!!! 

4 hours ago, rudemedic said:

Hi Courtney.

 

Have you considered that it might be because Courtney isn't that good. 

That maybe so, but can you honestly say that Vera, or Benteke are world beaters . The decision not to play him is purely based on his tweets and his reaction to the circus / clown thread put on by Davies. 

59 minutes ago, dannyboy55555 said:

We've been through this. If he plays for us he cant be moved on in Jan. Makes sense

Makes no sense whatsoever, we currently need forwards, and to let one go would be madness , we’ve signed Vera , can you honestly say that he's any better than Duffus ?????

There’s got to be a reason (given the current position with strikers (or the lack of them) why Courtney Duffus hasn’t been given a chance since his return from loan and that can only be interference from Lemsagam... I just wish the guy would be honest and tell us the truth instead of the slowly slowly c..p that he keeps on spouting 

Name? Phill

Location? Lees

How Long Supporting the Tics? 37 years

Best away match you've been to? Man City (City 1 Oldham 4 Roger Palmer Hat-trick)

All Time Greatest Player? Andy Ritchie

Biggest Rivals (in your eyes)? Blackburn Rovers