jorvik_latic
-
Posts
4,406 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Downloads
Articles
Posts posted by jorvik_latic
-
-
14 minutes ago, kowenicki said:
Isn’t their opinion valid? Is yours worth more?
Who said anything about their opinion? What a strange response. He just said there was no surprise who the people were who voted for Abdallah.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, Frankies6 said:
only 2 games in and way to early to start spitting our dummies out and demanding sacking coach and bringing in yet another fall giy
Who's demanding that the coach gets sacked? You're trying too hard now.
-
1
-
-
Sounded like there were some positives there, unlucky really (apart from the shocking defending for the 3rd).
-
2
-
-
Can't believe you're all rising to it.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, sjk2008 said:
That's a novel way of missing a pun.
I fucking hate them so much that I try not to notice them. Because they're shit.
And yes, I noticed this one. Still shit.
-
3 minutes ago, Ritchierich said:
Interesting it says that Queensy was being paid 11,000 books per week
...guess we shouldn’t read too much into that
It's Google Translate...
-
22 minutes ago, sjk2008 said:
Over the last few weeks, he's used words such as 'positive', 'surprisingly open' and 'encouraged' in terms of his dialogue with Al.
Darren wont be going against Al any time soon.
I asked him what he's seen that has changed him from being all for a protest to sticking up for them, we may have been missing something. All he came back with is that we're getting some transparency now. That's the best he could offer...
-
1 hour ago, wiseowl said:
Jorvik - I wasn't, and I`m not actually anti-Trust - I just want them to be effective in a time of real need.
My response was simply in response to the Trust rep's terse question to someone on here i.e. what would you do? - or something similar. I`m sick of a "supporters' body" being so impotent. For what it's worth, I`ll answer the question that the Trust rep raised i.e. what would you do?
a) I`d come clean and admit that the Trust is "supportive" of the FLG's intentions to purchase the land/ground - fine with that.
b) I`d therefore create a Trust/FLG alliance with a common goal - and ask all Latics fans to get on board
c) I`d then even go one step further and say the END GAME is to also "buy the badge/team".
d) We'd then have "the club", in its entirety, owned by one entity - and with a fans' share issue, the fans would have a stake in the club
e) In the interim, make sure that the club's obligations regarding payment of rent etc. are honoured - if they are not, act swiftly.
I`d certainly enthusiastically support something like this and would be willing to put energy and money (i.e. chip in to the fans' shareholding) into the cause.
What's the downside of something like that (?) - that's all I`m asking. At present we are in danger of walking blindly into the abyss - the place is an absolute mess in all regards.
That’s actually a really good post. I don’t think the Trust would ever do that so the next best thing is to focus attention on the next best thing.
-
28 minutes ago, fleetwood Blue said:
A fan led club is the way forward but could we raise enough funds through shares to keep the club afloat..
If the decks were cleared, the club could probably live within its means with a sensible budget and recruitment policy. Maybe.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, wiseowl said:
What's The Trust's plan ?
Stop trying to take this thread off topic with your anti Trust agenda. Like I’ve said previously, there’s room for the Trust and something independent.
Anyway, back on topic. @Lukers1 - when you get over your hangover
let us know the plan.
-
1 minute ago, wiseowl said:
There's all kinds of ways in reality. He could be "funding it himself" via a director's loan/s via money from "other sources". That would saddle us with debt - but without seeing monthly management accounts, we'd never know.
Lenders could take security against future income e.g. gate receipts (!), money from cup prize money, league payments and even future transfer income - anything is possible where there is money to be made, whittles.
Depends where we stand with SCMP. If we’re spending more than we’re allowed (
I know, I know) then turnover can’t come from loans.
-
23 minutes ago, Lukers1 said:
Lads. The Grapes, Lees. 7.20
And ladies
What date?
-
24 minutes ago, Lukers1 said:
Looks like I have traction, perfect, I’m going to a meeting within 10 days ...
Do it Wednesday night, strike while the iron is hot. Let me know if you need any help.
-
Just now, Lukers1 said:
We can put this agenda together, all we need is a few of us to go forward.
What are your thoughts? Where, when etc?
-
34 minutes ago, kowenicki said:
The OEC and the car park are a disgrace. OEC (Blitz of FLG) needs to get its finger out.
Jesus. You think they vandalised the toilets??
-
13 minutes ago, Clifford said:
This.
I believe the club will be left with massive debts and contracted wages when him and his brother walk away. All the debt will be with OAFC and he will be accountable for nothing on the other side of the world.
The only hope of us not becoming the next Bury is that the FLG are going to own the ground and therefore be able to catch the club when the rug gets pulled / the debts burst the lemmys little game.
No, no, no. The big nasty property developer (who worked for years in the ticket office for free) will just build houses on it when that happens.
-
8 minutes ago, Frankies6 said:
Callum Lang is in the George Hill stand.. One hopes that hes signing with us in time for saturday
He could have mates playing for Liverpool.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, JohnnyPimp said:
Cracking chip from Desire for 1-1.
Nice finish.
-
20 minutes ago, rudemedic said:
Like I said think anything younger is called something else see https://www.thegersstoreonline.com/replica-kits/home-kit/junior/757_rangers-19-20-hummel-home-mini-kit.html
Compared with https://www.thegersstoreonline.com/replica-kits/home-kit/junior/752_rangers-19-20-hummel-home-shirt-junior.html
Forgive the club choice but I knew they were hummel kits.
Think his point was that he’s been in the shop and there’s nothing for kids under 6 at all.
-
2 minutes ago, GlossopLatic said:
So Kowenicki is wrong then?
Yep. He won’t admit it again either.
-
29 minutes ago, kowenicki said:
I guess it’s vague enough to be open to interpretation, but they are certainly behaving like they own the shares. Employing senior staff on contracts etc.
10th May
As part of our purchase agreement, the fan led group have agreed to take over the operation of the Oldham Event Centre. This will commence on Monday, May 20th
Also 10th
As part of the agreed purchase of Boundary Park, the group are acquiring the shares in Oldham Event Centre. Thus taking over the 364 day operations within the stand.
17th
We are pleased to announce that subject to contract Simon Wood has agreed to renew his position as Executive Chef at Oldham Event Centre.
19th
We have now been running the OEC for almost a month and this has allowed us to inject some much needed resource into the day to day operation of the facility.
Leaving out quotes to suit your incorrect beliefs doesn’t make you right.
-
6 minutes ago, kowenicki said:
After the accounting period in question. Well... they said they have, no idea if they actually have...they say a lot of things.
Where have they said they’ve acquired the shares then??
-
7 minutes ago, kowenicki said:
How does it go Yardy? de de de de....
It’s a race to the bottom!
Which relate to way before the FLG got involved. I've heard that the accounts are waiting from something from the club (but may be wrong). So yeah, de de de de...
-
9 minutes ago, kowenicki said:
What’s the crack here? This lad just tweeted this...
Innocent or otherwise??
13 Aug 2019 First Gazette notice for compulsory strike-off This document is being processed and will be available in 5 days.It will be due to the late filing of accounts.
let us know the plan.
What date?
Which team?
in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Posted
3 of them are known.