Jump to content

Ackey

Staff
  • Posts

    12,728
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ackey

  1.  

    19 hours ago, archiecat said:

    dickhead

    This post was not reported - no action was taken.

     

    18 hours ago, latics22 said:

    Wow I’ve never had a banning? How long do they last ?

    Depends on how much of a weapon someone has been, combined with how good/bad my mood is that day of course.

     

    12 hours ago, simplythemostimportantkick said:

    Nah. Ackey takes a disliking to you and waits for the fist opportunity to dish em out , for far less than you see from some on a daily basis. There’s a few trolls on here should have been in the sun bin many times. 

    If I banned people I didn't like you wouldn't be posting, would you? In reality we're constantly asking for money to keep this place afloat and less members would make that a lot less troublesome... maybe I really should do more to remove people incapable of being tolerant of others. I'll add it to our funding-ideas list. 

     

    18 hours ago, Monty Burns said:

    Depends on Ackeys mood, l got a week for telling the truth.

    You're not wrong, to some extent. I'll say that.  However, you got a week for acting like child if memory serves.  We talked about calling people out publicly when moderation took place but we don't have the time or inclination to make that much effort. We've probably moderated 50 posts this season and from a quick look we've suspended 3 members (maximum was for a week) and banned 1 member (they literally asked for their account to be banned so they couldn't come here anymore - weird I know). Whatever fantasy people carry about this place being some kind of oppressive regime isn't very accurate. Indeed of the 4 Mods only Steve is a regular poster/visitor.  I'd not been here since the middle of last week and only came today as I actually went to the game on Saturday.

     

    Speaking of which... on topic... I thought we actually played quite well and despite letting them get in to the game more than I felt we should have, we never looked in real danger. A goal for them could have made things very interesting, but that's a big what if.  

  2. 11 hours ago, disjointed said:

    I may be wrong but I don't think the club see eye to eye with this board. 

    It's been a long time, and things have notably changed, though they don't exactly seem flush with cash, since those days - in the past it was a tense relationship and those who've been here a long time will remember we were actually "official" for a while but that didn't last.

  3. 1 hour ago, yarddog73 said:

    Out of interest is that being covered? 

    Genuine answer is Yes, No and Maybe. It depends on the day you ask really - posts like the above with cap in hand are the times when we're at "no" - today we're back to "yes" thanks to some generous donations above. Sometime soon we'll drift back to "maybe" again and come back out, cap in hand... 

  4. 13 hours ago, Bristolatic said:

    Ackey, could you please give us an idea what the annual cost of running the site is? Maybe, if that is split across the board (pun intended), it may not be too daunting a request per person.

    We're currently talking about our options, one of which could prove to be simply stating the cost per average user and, as you say, charging to that model.  There's pros and cons to that, not least of all we've always tried to keep this place completely free-to-air.

     

    For now anyone who can chuck a quid in, it'll help...

  5. Afternoon Everyone,

     

    It's the time we've all come to know and love loathe; we're almost out of cash!  If anyone's in a position to make a donation then now's the time - we'll not be able to make the end of 2018 with the money we have in the donation pot.

     

    Further, it's becoming increasingly clear that as a Moderation team we are not really capable of supporting the site through the current model; this site is expensive to maintain and run, and coming to you all cap-in-hand every few months is both demoralising and time consuming. What this means is that once again we may have to look at the models in play and how we can better support the site. 

     

    We want to be open; we have had people offer to buy the site lock-stock from us and take on the cost from there. That's not agreeable to us, as we've invested too much emotionally to do that. If someone wanted to establish their own supporters forum and make efforts to migrate users we'd welcome that and support it in any possible way.  Equally if we've anyone looking to partner in a 'back seat' way, such as promotional material on the site for a funding period, we'd welcome that too.

     

    We're all-ears, folks.

     

    OWTB!

    Ackey

  6. When I heard of O4U's passing yesterday I came straight here. The board was, as always, awash with people arguing about petty things. People winding each other up. Arguments over agreements. Slander, even.

     

    I walked away. 

     

    Last night I had some beers with a few other Latics fans and we made a toast to O4U, talked about what a great contributor to life he was; positive, intelligent, humble, accommodating, considered, learned, many more things which it seems would make him feel very uncomfortable to have said of him. We missed having him there in our group, despite it being a place he'd never been.

     

    Today I came back.

     

    There's still all of the same factionalism and bitterness towards each other here, from people no less capable of being like O4U than Dave himself was. Why not stop and think when you next comment if it's the kind of thing O4U would have said. Have you taken a moment to reflect on it, are you making a positive contribution to the world, to OWTB. Or, are you thoughtlessly reacting only to make yourself heard, to make the person you are speaking to feel worse, not better. 

     

    You'll be missed O4U, as we are deeply and sincerely worse off without you.

  7. On 07/04/2018 at 5:07 PM, BP1960 said:

    How did Hamer do? 

    For someone who can't be older than 14 I would say he did exceptional.  He looked a very calm head for a kid making his debut, in a team which was a bit all over at times. If that's what he builds on, and isn't just an adrenaline fueled anomaly, he could prove a good find. He's absolutely tiny, mind.  Need to get him on whatever bulk-up plan they put Tarky on!

     

    Elsewhere I thought we looked entirely like a team capable of going down. Not sure that means we will or not, I've seen only two games this year and thus far too little to comment.  But based on the limited exposure to Charlton away and Oxford away, it makes me think staying up would be more down to other's failings than our own successes. 

  8. I hate to say it, but if the issues are on your device not OWTB it's hard for me to help you out... simply because the depth of variables at that point is insane. 

     

    The best thing to do is:

    1. Airplane Mode On/Off (leave on for about 10-15 seconds)
    2. Turn Device Off/On (leave off for 30 seconds)
    3. Reboot Router (simply remove power cord, wait 30 seconds, replace it)

    If you still have issues I am happy to reply to people, but can't promise that'll be quick!

     

    For those interested, it sounds most like a DNS cache issue.  In simple terms (ish); each provider (mobile company, ISP of internet at home, ISP of internet at work, many more besides) store a list of places on the internet and the site that points to them. So, OWTB.co.uk points to a server which host the site. When it expired it defaults to the providers, who use it for spammy links. We then renew it and it points back to our stuff..... but in the mean time, the mobile providers and ISPs we all use have stored a cache version which says OWTB points to the spammy page, not us.  Further, your local devices store a cache of their own (kinda) too... again, just making it more complicated.

     

    If you really want to get in to it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System 

     

    Finally; Sorry!  We do try and keep these things from happening, but there's only three of us and as we've said so many times these things are picked up in our spare time (I'm on holiday right now!) and so do get missed now and again.

     

    Cheers,

    Ack

     

  9. Domain now renewed and should be fine for everyone.  If you still have device-specific issues that's likely a cache problem. On laptop/PC you can try holding "CTRL" and then pressing "F5" which should force it through. If it's still an issue google "clear browser cache [browser name]" and follow those steps.

     

    The site, as evidenced by these posts, is fine now. 

  10. On 1/12/2018 at 7:02 PM, daniel said:

    Does it cost more to have all the other forums? I sporadically read through them, and it is good to have more options, but if it costs less then get rid of them and just keep the Latics one? This is the main reason we all visit the site and I don’t think you’d get any complaints if it meant OWTB could keep running.

    In theory it's not that much and it helps keep the noise down in the 'main' board - which in turn should help too, as less clicks is less costs.  But, we've never tested it any other way - so it could be one of those things we have to give a go.

     

    As above from Steve, thanks to those who have contributed and/or continue to do so. 

  11. A bit of both... if we get a few donations in the next couple of weeks the pot may be topped up enough to keep going. If not, we pay next months bill and then by March we're looking at an empty kitting and will not have enough to pay the bills.  Previously we've either got lucky with incoming donations in time or Steve/Matt have covered the difference until we do.

     

    At this point I don't honestly know what will come of March - it may be that we cut back significantly on functionality / boards in the hope that dramatically reduces costs. Or it may be that we have to accept defeat. 

×
×
  • Create New...