Jump to content

Lee Sinnott

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    10,064
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lee Sinnott

  1. 8 minutes ago, whittles left foot said:

    Why is that? Teams like Wrexham, Stockport and Bradford will have decent followings that the police have to manage.

    They have no choice but to host those clubs as Accrington are playing them. Oldham playing Halifax at Accrington doesn't need to happen - why would the police want the extra hassle...?

    • Like 1
  2. 7 hours ago, diggleblue said:

    It's on their official Web site as well.I think it's disgusting that they haven't announced our match arrangements yet.

    Either WE are being awkward or they hope to play us at their ground after it dries out a bit. But having seen how bad it was and the fact that more rain is forecast I suspect they'll have to play us elsewhere as well.Whatever it's a shambles.

    Lancs Police wouldn't agree to us playing at Accrington. Accrington had agreed to all 3 Halifax matches to take place there - Police refused. Our away following for the game is what is complicating things...

  3. 4 minutes ago, Only Blue said:

    I agree we don't know the agreement between both clubs but surely when they do negotiate with each other a common sense approach would be the team finishing the season, with a deadline to do so, takes primacy.

     

    Again, to me, that is common sense, and they should be working together and helping one another, but I am just naive.

    A pitch that isn't playable for a game of football can often be playable for rugby...

    • Like 1
  4. 6 hours ago, nzlatic said:

    Mellon did that wouldn’t you say? 11 wins and 4 draws out of his first 20 league games. Then a bad run followed. But it seems for many that bad run of 8 games is enough to get rid. 

    Initially, yep - and that's probably the only reason he hasn't been sacked or had the majority turn on him. The managers who get time are able to consistently churn out results...

  5. 1 hour ago, Littlemoor Lad said:

    Truth is, no manager who doesn't come up with the goods here and fast, ever will.

    Such has the ever lasting patience of the fans been tested

    That's not just here, it's everywhere. Every manager in the modern day who has been given "time" has been given the time because they've gone in and won football matches. Wild was mentioned earlier - people point out he was given 3 years at Halifax. The reason he got 3 years is because he went in and immediately won games of football.

     

    Flip side of that is Noble at Wealdstone. Gone in there, can't buy a win. Sacked. It isn't just an Oldham issue...

    • Like 3
  6. 5 minutes ago, deyres42 said:

    The only reason people seem to have for keeping him is based on what he did elsewhere some time ago.

     

    Open your eyes to the here and now and the absolute dogs dinner he has made of it.

    You're probably not far off. My faith in him is down to his previous efforts in this division and not really anything to do with how he's done at Oldham so far...

    • Like 1
  7. 16 minutes ago, JoeP said:

    I'll expect the aggressive counter arguments, but not surprised if there's truth behind this. There's "being nasty" in a positive way for the club and there's just "being nasty".  Our downturn in form has coincided with his return to the team.  Also, he hasn't scored from open play since Oxford at home!  Blimey!  I didn't realise that.

    It's not true. He scored at home to Gateshead in December from open play...

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...