Magister

6 minutes ago, stevesidg said:

Are you AF?

It feels like I am walking into an ambush here but who or what is AF?

Just now, whittles left foot said:

I think the last hour has summed up my earlier comment perfectly.

...and mine. Thank you for your contribution

9 minutes ago, simplythemostimportantkick said:

Fixed it for you ?

Oh dear .....It wasn't a question.. 6 foot 7 and it still goes over head

35 minutes ago, TheBigDog said:

 

Get many downboats?

Hundreds of them ...Mandela got locked up

31 minutes ago, simplythemostimportantkick said:

Or being a ‘proper twat’, yes I know my punctuation will be wrong .....

You really don't have a clue do you

2 minutes ago, whittles left foot said:

Crikey Magister you post a lot but you don't actually contribute anything.

I get a lot of replies and quotes though

22 minutes ago, mcfluff1985 said:

Magister, if you were there then we would listen to you. As it happens, you weren't. 

Thomas Didymus reincarnated?

29 minutes ago, Monty Burns said:

‘the’ HMRC? ?

Depends whether you are using the acronym as a proper noun

Just now, Buckshawlatic said:

 

They clearly aren’t looking into anything where you may be of interest. Arguing with you is quite tiresome - my point was you said Moisley should say what occurred - I rightly pointed out that he did just that in what was requested, provided and subsequently returned. The details of what all that was would never be revealed by any company but whatever it is no one at the club seems overly concerned so I won’t be letting it ruin my Christmas 

Moisley has said paper not computers was taken away....so what? They turned up mob handed for a reason and took stuff away and Moisley's words do not in any way advance or clarify discussion around the issue

1 minute ago, Buckshawlatic said:

 

Not generally how the authorities work... 

Well the HMRC don't come round to me to pick up paperwork........

1 minute ago, Buckshawlatic said:

 

He did - they asked for some paperwork which was provided and has now been returned 

Was it very heavy this paperwork then if it needed the attendance of so many officialls? .....if I wanted paperwork I would ring up and ask for it ...wouldn't you ? ....unless of course......

18 minutes ago, singe said:

Interestingly Mark Moisley refutes two of these points categorically.

"I heard things like the serious fraud office were involved, no they weren't, they didn't come to the ground. I heard things like computers were getting taken away, no they weren't."

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/oldham-athletic-abdallah-lemsagam-latics-14030272

Interesting indeed!.......perhaps Mr Moisley would retain more credibility if he talked about what did happen then....not what he says did not happen

Let's not get carried away.......we won 5-1 on Saturday which came after 3 league games without  a win or a goal

Just watching Cardiff on Tv.......what Latics fan  would have thought that Etheridge would be playing for the  second in the championship while Ripley is on the bench for the bottom of the league.....and think we have got a better keeper than him anyway

Cornell  will be playing for somebody!s first team next?

2 minutes ago, Magic Mikey said:

If they are buying the club as a "trophy" purchase, then it's realistic to think they would want to spend a bit of money on trophy polish.

Yes But once you start using duraglit you have to continue using duraglit until it becomes too expensive etc......

37 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

Some massively naive people in this thread. A business deal is a private matter that will take as long as it takes.  Stop being so entitled. 

I think niavety also covers people who think football club owners...especially incoming ones....are philanthropists with a passion for said club

5 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

 

Because you have to address rumours. Imagine the shite we would reading without the little detail we have. 

Right let's start some rumours ....that should smoke them out then?

7 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

Some massively naive people in this thread. A business deal is a private matter that will take as long as it takes.  Stop being so entitled. 

It was them who went public though wasn't it

1 hour ago, L1onheartNew said:

 

So what i think that you are trying to say is that you used to be with it, but then they changed what ‘it’ was, and now what you're with isn’t it. And what’s ‘it’ seems weird and scary to you. Am i right?

It would certainly make sense if it was the case wouldn't it

4 minutes ago, whittles left foot said:

Just for you. A timescale for a change of ownership.Hope this helps.

Yes yes.but what does it mean .....does It mean £1 million investment or £10 million or £100 million.......does the OEC change hands?.....does Blitz sell the Salford Royal contract....whose are the houses on the old car park....does ownership of Little Wembley change hands etc etc etc ........

just for for me can you throw any light on it

2 minutes ago, whittles left foot said:

So what? The mistake was giving you a timescale so you can beat the club with it at every opportunity, It will happen when it happens (hopefully).

The trouble is that I have not got a clue what "it" is whether it happens or not

55 minutes ago, Ricardo said:

Behave yourself, it's called giving a nickname you doofus, it has nothing to do with race, colour or creed

YoU mean like Sooty used to be  a nickname?

13 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

 

Going where? I cant imagine he is in that much demand at our level, certainly not any higher. More likely to drop a league. 

Could well go down a division but there are teams in there with more money than us and ambition to get promotion

3 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

Clarke injured? Not even on the bench. 

...or going in Jan?

Is it right that before today we have not won a home game in December for 6 years