Jump to content

philliggi

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    2,582
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by philliggi

  1. Is it not a case though that the reason you don't recall an incident is because they haven't been allowed to develop?  No one recalls something that didn't happen.

     

    Obviously the old way needed work. That's why it was changed in the first place. I don't advocate flagging a player down injured offside, but the scenarios being suggested in this thread against my argument are purely theoretical and would very rarely happen in real time play. How often is it someone is ever in an offside position on the opposite wing to the play? It doesn't happen in practice. 

     

    I've seen it happen where a player makes a run forward, possibly 30 or 40 yards away from the ball in an attempt to receive a long ball. The defence has played that player offside correctly but The ball has been intercepted or deflected and the play has gone elsewhere. 

    Now to me, he is offside. He may be 30 or 40 yards away but he is still involved with play. He has actively altered how that defensive line is operating, regardless of weather he received the ball or not. 

    It's the same if a player is 20 or 30 yards forward of a keeper but in his line of sight. How is it possible for a referee to judge if that player is involved with play or not?

     

    Too many scenarios are open to interpretation and imo it should be simpler than that. It is just my opinion though and I don't doubt for a minute that things will remain the same. 

     

  2. Been a discussion on the referees thread about the offside rule and thought I'd open it up to wider debate.

     

    Personally I think it's a joke. Ok in theory but far too difficult to implement effectively and consistently. It's too open to interpretation wether a player is interfering in play or not and what one linesman will give another wouldn't. 

     

    In my book Its too much of an idealism, great in a perfect world but results differ wildly in practice. 

     

    So what would you prefer. The current system as it is, or a return to the old system where if your offside your offside. Simple as.

     

    The old way, although not perfect, was easily understood by all involved. If your offside 30 yard away from play and your team score it's ruled out for offside. It's tough luck but you know the rules and should play to the letter of the law.  

     

    This is purely for discussion purposes it won't be changing any time soon.

  3. A few over the top comments here imo. We have played 2 games. I didn't go yesterday but we didn't lose. We lost on opening day which even the best teams do sometimes, and to the favourites for the league. We are missing 6 or 7 players and we have a new management team in. 

     

    Can we not just see how it goes for the first 10 games? We wasn't far off the pace against mk last week things haven't derailed that much since then.

     

    It's not a dunn Darren whatsisface situation yet

  4. So it's nearly upon us, and we have seen how the club has taken shape this summer. New faces on and off the pitch.

     

    I've linked the 2 questions together because ultimately I think it will lead to the same debate.

     

    Personally I'm not feeling this season. I don't think we will push for the top three and I can't see a sustained play off push either. I just don't get where some of the confidence is coming from.

     

    Maybe it's a hang over from last year, but I'm struggling to get excited about this season. It'll probably all change once a ball has been kicked but if we finish top half I Think We would be doing well. 

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...