TheBlueFlag Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Not to have a go at Dickov or anything he just says on the oldham website that he couldn't find a video of the tackle however on the BBC highlights the footage is there. Why not use that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorvik_latic Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 The angle is all wrong to prove anything... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueFlag Posted April 30, 2011 Author Share Posted April 30, 2011 The angle is all wrong to prove anything... Yeah but its not like we have any other angles. We aint no Chelsea with camera angles set up everywere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonesyOAFC Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Yeah but its not like we have any other angles. We aint no Chelsea with camera angles set up everywere. Which is why we can't appeal. It says on the site that the camera angle was the angle the ref would have viewed it from... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 (edited) Yeah but its not like we have any other angles. We aint no Chelsea with camera angles set up everywere. I think that's the point. We don't have them. Lowe runs in front of the camera, blocking any clear televised view of the impact. We have no televised evidence that the referee is wrong. The other unstated reason is there's an appeal fee which isn't cheap. If we were 1 point outside the play-off spots or in risk of the drop it would be worth it, but we're not, so it isn't. Edited April 30, 2011 by opinions4u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueFlag Posted April 30, 2011 Author Share Posted April 30, 2011 Yeah I see his point now my bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singe Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Yeah I see his point now my bad Nah, twas a fair enough question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 Yeah I see his point now my bad Nothing bad about asking the question. I was wondering the same until I saw the BBC footage yesterday. Keep 'em coming! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie_J Posted April 30, 2011 Share Posted April 30, 2011 I think that's the point. We don't have them. Lowe runs in front of the camera, blocking any clear televised view of the impact. We have no televised evidence that the referee is wrong. The other unstated reason is there's an appeal fee which isn't cheap. If we were 1 point outside the play-off spots or in risk of the drop it would be worth it, but we're not, so it isn't. Exactly. The burden of proof is on Latics to demostrate that the ref was wrong. The video footage isn't strong enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.