tangerinedreams

I thought he'd got his studs caught in the turf and twisted his knee, their pitch did look a bit on the heavy side..

It could get worse before it gets better, just saying...

I wouldn't turn my nose up either.

Is PS still being used to cover the Latvian's salary?

The corners were dreadful, what were they kicking, a :censored:in cannonball? No threat up front at all, the Vale defence could have had a picnic in the D if they'd have wanted.

Hope Eddie just laughed in his face!

Could you pm me Zorro re: Fergies book if you still want it ta

Maybe if his fitness was worked on he could fill the gap left by KW when he fills in for the injured TW...

Neigh lad.

Nope, Kangaroo Court complete with Barrack room lawyers! :-)

I'd have also thought that when the Jury were retiring to consider their verdict that the Judge would have something to say about coming to their verdict with only the evidence presented by the defence and prosecution and not to be swayed by the actions of his employer, the club in this case.

I know, my mistake...I used an apostrophe instead of a full stop.

He can't but he can claim that the grounds for dismissal were unfair- the video on its own, if he's found guilty after the jury have seen the evidence then he really is up :censored: creek without the proverbial, however if he's found not guilty then it won't be the last we hear of him.

I think you're reading too much into it in your earlier posts Mr 24.

I can't see how the PFA/ FL would side with him tbh because not only has he brought the club into disrepute but also the game. Given the nature of the allegation I would have thought that LJ would have had him in the office first thing Monday morning before training (after watching the video footage numerous times on Sunday) and suspended him on full pay pending further investigations ( I believe he wasn't on pay for the few days whilst the investigations were being carried out?), in other words until LJ had spoken with SC and decided the course of action to be taken. After the investigations had taken place CM plus his agent/ solicitor or witness of Montano's choice would be invited in to answer the allegation of 'spot fixing', after that another meeting should have taken place for the disciplinary action to be imposed, in this case- instant dismissal. As far as the video evidence goes he's bang to rights (had a case like this at work last year but involved a photograph), from what I can see the only unfair action by the club was not to keep him on full pay whilst suspended (if that's what they did), the only other thing going for him is his previous disciplinary record, whether he'd been fined before etc. I can't quite work out where his unfair dismissal allegation has popped up from though, unless Montano had thought; well I haven't been proven guilty in a court of law therefore I'm innocent until proven guilty...I doubt his contract will be paid up until this has gone thru the courts, so his version of events as to why he was in that hotel room with Sodje and the reporter will be down to the jury to decide whether or not he's guilty of spot fixing, I wouldn't be surprised if the video footage from the Wolves match was made available to the jury. If he is found guilty then I would have thought the club will refuse to pay his contract up, if he's found not guilty and the club refuse to pay his contract up then I don't think that'll be the last they hear from his legal team.

He didn't happen to have his missus (long blonde hair) with him did he?

Thought he did ok.

£10 win @ 19/1...ya never know...

WhaaaaaaaT?

Bollocks.

Just seen Marlon King at Ming Ing...

Hers my formation..it involves Jap bondage...it might be the only way!

Careful what you say there: 80 lashes for false accusation...bitch.

Where's UD when ya need her? Ha ha