real

If you insist on being pedantic which element of that explanation didnt fit the way in which I use it. It's bloody hard work on here sometimes.

Your now going to need to revue that replie and point out all the faults. Which is a big job ?

Irony

That's hypocrite

Trust you to support the guy abusing people as "mongs". Classy.

That I answer to a leader.

No. Someone who lies to try and cause more discontent amongst fans than there already was is a mong

You've come out with plenty of lies to cause discontent amongst fans yourself.

Hypocrit.

And ignorant to boot.

 

I think there is a need to distinguish in life generally between people who tell lies and people who say things that turn out not to be the case

SC probably didn't lie, but was probably fairly incompetent in not being able to accurately assess potential income from a £6m investment.

On the other hand, those who predicted administration based on the exit of Shez and the repeated refusals from others had no professional knowledge or basis and equally turned out to have reached an incorrect conclusion.

Same type of poor forecast, but one is running the club.

You blame the referee because they were kicking the :censored: out of them.....why don't people realise players have responsibility? The police aren't on the road so I will drive at 100 mph. Police's fault not mine?

That's rubbish.

What you really mean is...

The police see a driver at 100mph and decide that it's fine. Then they see the same driver at 100mph and decide it's still fine.

Then they see a different driver at 100mph and take his license off him.

You really think driver 2 has no right to think the police are idiots? That they should not be questioned about their actions?

The psychology of those making decisions is a risky thing to allow unbridled power.

 

You don't like being made to look in the mirror to see your own actions do you?

Typical bully mentally, gives it out, calling people morons and such,but weasels out when shown their own behaviour in the same vein.

Trolling again. Nothing to say on the thread, just having a pop at other people again.

As I am one who fluffy has had a pop at, it's relevant. Not got anything to do with you though,but you like trying to troll me, it perhaps gives you some pathetic pleasure.

Any views on the game today? Lapado to start or on the bench?

Are you still trying this nonsense?

How will my view of the team make any difference? Is SR using owtb to make selections?

Doesn't attract the casual family though - £68 for a family of 4 vs about £34 on STs.

There should also be an option in kids STs to swap stands for a limited number of games. This would help reinforce a feeling of being part of the whole club.

The disparity between kids ST prices and pay by match should be addressed.

Match price is about 50% higher than ST price for adults , but kids is 500%.

You're quoting a post from 22nd July? Back in your box

You don't like being made to look in the mirror to see your own actions do you?

Typical bully mentally, gives it out, calling people morons and such,but weasels out when shown their own behaviour in the same vein.

Do your leaders know you're communicating outside the Facebook group?

Where did I have a go at people attending? (would be a bit odd)

I think you are still a lot confused about your own actions, and also about other people.

You think you know stuff when in fact you're full of crap, making crass assumptions and claiming innocence when you're just a persistent :censored: stirrer.

Does uncle Simon know you're playing out?

Like Jim White, turn up once every six months when something happens.

Trolling again. Nothing to say on the thread, just having a pop at other people again.

I'm sure the car park was part council owned, as it was originally planned as a park and ride. Not sure if that's still the case.

Also it's worth knowing that some parking companies do take court action thesedays, so be careful.

B+Q boycott for anyone who uses them?

I'll get back to you on these questions

He's on about loans for the club but also relates to his previous responses. He's set in his ways and unwilling to change, shouldn't challenge it I guess but he's busy giving flack out so I'll dish him some back.

 

(Awesome reverse psychology now because I've told him that)

 

((Doubly so))

You are an ignorant, trolling fool. What's the flak I've given out cherub? I think you need to look in the mirror and stop looking for my every post to fulfil your sad existence. You are the dog fetching the stick every time I throw it.

Do you believe you are entitled to "know it all"?

Where have I asked for that? Do you believe that comment on the debt disappearing?

Someone get this kid the membership numbers before they combust...

That's hilarious.

Is it really such a major ask? Even tracy admits it's a valid question.

The trust has responsibility for the 3% stake and directors seat that I and many others contributed to.

If it can't even articulate its membership numbers, what faith is there that it can do anything of any worth?

Mock if you like, cos it's easier than wanting to see an effective trust doing something visible and gaining strength and momentum through increased membership

Cheers TGWB, I'm waiting for the new details with regards to membership and the who's who, is still to be completed with some info from the trust directors themselves.

 

I will keep you posted

 

Ta

Tracy, following your reply I also looked at the meetings page - there's dates for meetings that don't have matching meeting updates, and none mention membership numbers, so I gave up.

Still not sure whether there's anything being achieved for fans (rather than supplementing Corney's cashflow)

Fortunately my schedule doesn't run to yours.

 

Would you rather be round the table, with eyes and ears open, or on the outside, desperately trying to peek through a window to grab what scraps of information come your way?

You mean the seat on the board is the big positive?

In what way? We don't get updates, but we do get told that a debt "might disappear" ; we get meaningless platitudes ; we end up with cashflow problems. The seat on the board doesn't appear to have done much apart from get the last incumbent a chance to end up in the club. A classic example of poor governance and what could be compared to "agency capture"

As one of the Trusts biggest critics, it's amazing how you have missed one of the biggest positives of the Trust.

 

Blinkered.

Not got anything have you, my little stalker? You're the blinkered one, making silly assumptions and statements you can't back up.

:censored: me I have never seen such an over reaction to a basic thing like tickets in all my life!! Think some people on here need to have a word with themselves. 'Oaps getting distressed' 'total cock up' 'the club is laughably :censored:'

Just absolutely pathetic. It's going to be trial and error instead of acting like kids why not speak with the new support liaison officer. Pretty sure that is what he is there for!!

Why should it be trial and error?

Is that what we should expect?

And what gives you the right to belittle the problems other people experienced? Just because you were not affected you have no thought for anyone else.

 

I heard somebody needed medical treatment so that might be the reason ?

I was told there weren't enough staff for the bar, so it was left closed and locked.

If you'd walked from RRE end of ground then I guess the distance wouldn't have altered to get to your seats

If from the other end then ,what, an additional 100 yards?

Slightly annoying but"total cock up" ??!!

Yeah, could have made him go in through the north stand and circumnavigate the ground, so well done Latics on preventing that from happening. Count your blessings.

As one of the Trusts biggest critics, it's amazing how you have missed one of the biggest positives of the Trust.

 

Blinkered.

I'm not going to play a guessing game, so why not actually say what you're on about?