jimmydowie Posted March 24, 2009 Posted March 24, 2009 Was Lee Hughes injured tonight? He stormed off down the tunnel when subbed tonight and the team looked like a weight had been lifted from their shoulders when he went off. They played a hell of a lot better without him. Is he a disruptive influence on the team???
laticsrblue Posted March 24, 2009 Posted March 24, 2009 Were you there? According to Big Gordon on LW he had an ice pack on his leg during the day so probably an injury and maybe he stormed off for more treatment.
jimmydowie Posted March 25, 2009 Author Posted March 25, 2009 Yes, I was there. I was one of the merry band. Even if he was injured the change that the two subs brought about was quite impressive. It really did appear that everybody else felt able to play more freely. If he's injury free on Saturday maybe he should start on the bench? Give him a bit of desire.
Lags Posted March 25, 2009 Posted March 25, 2009 Yes, I was there. I was one of the merry band. Even if he was injured the change that the two subs brought about was quite impressive. It really did appear that everybody else felt able to play more freely. If he's injury free on Saturday maybe he should start on the bench? Give him a bit of desire. I think his desire is for the end of the season now and a chance to move.
johnny punkster Posted March 25, 2009 Posted March 25, 2009 Was Lee Hughes injured tonight? He stormed off down the tunnel when subbed tonight and the team looked like a weight had been lifted from their shoulders when he went off. They played a hell of a lot better without him. Is he a disruptive influence on the team??? stormed off down the tunnel??? he sat on the bench with the rest ..nothing sinister.
Diego_Sideburns Posted March 25, 2009 Posted March 25, 2009 stormed off down the tunnel??? he sat on the bench with the rest ..nothing sinister. He must have been wishing he'd still been on the pitch to get his head on those crosses which started to come over. Maybe Hughes was injured, but if not and if Joe thought Kabba would link better with Lewi, I question Joe's judgement.
razza699 Posted March 25, 2009 Posted March 25, 2009 spot on Lags. 18 goals great but could have had a shed load more. IF he had signed his contract and looked a bit sharper would have been delighted but no one can play with him up front. Lewi came close but many have tried and failed. easily could have been 30
edhunteruk Posted March 25, 2009 Posted March 25, 2009 He must have been wishing he'd still been on the pitch to get his head on those crosses which started to come over. Maybe Hughes was injured, but if not and if Joe thought Kabba would link better with Lewi, I question Joe's judgement. why do you question his judgement??? he has seen two games now as well as the leeds n bristol games,he obviously understands more than we do that it isnt happening and change is needed. is it that all other strikers cant play with hughes....or that hughes cant play with any other striker????
Diego_Sideburns Posted March 25, 2009 Posted March 25, 2009 why do you question his judgement??? he has seen two games now as well as the leeds n bristol games,he obviously understands more than we do that it isnt happening and change is needed. is it that all other strikers cant play with hughes....or that hughes cant play with any other striker???? Lewis has shown that he can play with Hughes and Hughes named Lewis as his preferred partner, although I accept that Joe may not have been informed of that. In his interview with Gordon on the OS, Joe says "we missed two open-goal headers". If Hughes was subbed for tactical reasons, then I find it impossible to understand on last night's showing why Joe preferred to keep Kabba on the pitch. If I had to put my money on any player in the squad scoring those headers, it would have had to be Hughes. We could have had all three points last night and Joe admits his disappointment at only getting one. The chances were created late in the game, when Cheltenham defended too deeply, but only the most difficult one was taken. http://www.oldhamathletic.co.uk/page/Home/0,,10337,00.html
jimmydowie Posted March 26, 2009 Author Posted March 26, 2009 Call me Nostradamus!!! This was no surprise really was it? It'll be a case of Lee Who-ghues on Saturday when we get three points. Wembley here we come!!
chaddyowl4 Posted March 26, 2009 Posted March 26, 2009 spot on Lags. 18 goals great but could have had a shed load more. IF he had signed his contract and looked a bit sharper would have been delighted but no one can play with him up front. Lewi came close but many have tried and failed.alessandra is a joke!!!! about as much use as a hole in a bucket,
Guest sheridans_world Posted March 26, 2009 Posted March 26, 2009 alessandra is a joke!!!! about as much use as a hole in a bucket, Echo... Thats why he scored a hat-trick against a team who is currently in the playoff's?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now