Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
skysports!!!!! :disappointed:

 

If we had got him in. it would have meant dropping either Reuben or Greegs or perhaps playing 3 at the back? Either way he looked a class player when he was here.

 

Let's hope we don't have an injury at the back... :blink:

Posted
Ronaldo > Parker

Trotman> Gregan

 

Differntials are about the same... :wink:

 

The only difference is that Ronaldo is marginally less of a :censored: ing :censored: than Kiegan Parker. And also tends to shag a slightly higher claibre of Z list celebrity.

Posted

Should never have sold him in hindsight, young centre backs of that quality don't grow on trees and thought he was worth a lot more, he was quality all round and even good going forward. Would have been in his best interests to remain at the club and play regular football. Good luck to him.

Posted

He was out of contract at the end of that year. And with what happened the season before with Porter TTA were never going to take the risk. 500k for 20 odd appearences was good business. Also remember that he got injured for the rest of that season and for most of last season. There was even a point where his career was in question. Selling him, even with hindsight was great business. But we should have tried to get him on loan.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...