Bring Back Ronnie Moore Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 (edited) ----------------flahavan----- -holdsworth--greegs--rubes---hills (maybe Steer?) ----------furman-------whits------------- ---Smalley------Taylor---------Parker---- -------------Blackman----------- Edited November 21, 2009 by Bring Back Pukka Pies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 We looked better playing 3-4-3 ! I take it :censored:'s suspended? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Ronnie Moore Posted November 21, 2009 Author Share Posted November 21, 2009 We looked better playing 3-4-3 ! I take it :censored:'s suspended? I thought :censored: had a quiet game today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeLatics Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 I've been saying 4-2-3-1 all season!! Would you consider Brooke, instead of Blackman now, though? He's only been given 5 minutes at the end of games, with hopeless balls being punted up to him all season! Maybe a run in the side would get him going? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wozz_oafc Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 I've been saying 4-2-3-1 all season!! Would you consider Brooke, instead of Blackman now, though? He's only been given 5 minutes at the end of games, with hopeless balls being punted up to him all season! Maybe a run in the side would get him going? Not over Blackman at all! Blackman played very well and was involved in getting the ball down so we could play, something we have missed of late without Abbott. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nava Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 ----------------flahavan----- -holdsworth--greegs--rubes---hills (maybe Steer?) ----------furman-------whits------------- ---Smalley------Taylor---------Parker---- -------------Blackman----------- If we're playing that formation then i would have :censored: in for Whitts as he will add more steel in the middle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snookmeister Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 If we're playing that formation then i would have :censored: in for Whitts as he will add more steel in the middle. On the strength of today, you can drop Parker/:censored: for Colbeck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 On the strength of today, you can drop Parker/:censored: for Colbeck. I would prefer to assess :censored: on more than today. There's no case for dropping him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc-latics Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 ----------------flahavan----- -holdsworth--greegs--rubes---hills (maybe Steer?) ----------furman-------whits------------- ---Smalley------Taylor---------Parker---- -------------Blackman----------- what about :censored:? both him and whits had good games today especially whitaker. they were playing through whitaker and that is what he should be doing. furman hasnt been as good as he was promosed to be so maybe this will bring out the best in him. also, colbeck had his best game. if anything keep parker on the bench and make parker fight for his place Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyres_28 Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 what about :censored:? both him and whits had good games today especially whitaker. they were playing through whitaker and that is what he should be doing. furman hasnt been as good as he was promosed to be so maybe this will bring out the best in him. also, colbeck had his best game. if anything keep parker on the bench and make parker fight for his place :censored: and casper are just far too static ... we were crying out for a :censored: MK DONS performance passing and moving and actually getting into the box on occassions !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsPete Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 On the strength of today AND leeds, Smalley shouldn't be included. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runningman Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 I thought the 1 - 4 - 5 formation worked well in the last 10 minutes - it might be the future Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ste1987 Posted November 21, 2009 Share Posted November 21, 2009 I've been saying 4-2-3-1 all season!! Would you consider Brooke, instead of Blackman now, though? He's only been given 5 minutes at the end of games, with hopeless balls being punted up to him all season! Maybe a run in the side would get him going? I'd still play Blackman, but I think Brooke is now in a position to provide some serious competition to him. At times today, Blackman lacked concentration with a few balls and flick ons going to no one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garcon Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 Not over Blackman at all! Blackman played very well and was involved in getting the ball down so we could play, something we have missed of late without Abbott. Unfortunately there seems to be one key difference between Abbott and Blackman when playing as the target man. Abbott receives the ball, creates himself a bit of space and then plays the simple lay off to a team mate to build the move. Blackman receives the ball, creates himself a bit of space and then passes the ball to the opposition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.