oafcprozac Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 He got about 30 seconds as a sub for a few Celtic games, they didn't play him when they had a :censored:load of injuries and none of the other forwards could hit a cow's arse with a banjo. He has had two good spells in his career, one when he was coming to the end of his contract with us, the other at Hibs. Overall he has been fairly mediocre. To be fair when he had his best spell with us during November/December 2004 his contract wasn't up until June 2006 - perhaps he finally was reaping the benefits of an extended run and not being '50/50' for games. Sadly that mindset soon returned... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcprozac Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 I liked Killen when he was fit, he's only gone and shown it by playing at a higher level, two major flaws being he was never fit and was on a massive wage Exactly! A bit like Darren Beckford... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsslatic Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 I think you'd have to be pretty clueless not to agree with the fact that Killen was pretty decent when fit and more than adequate for a team at the top end of the league. Sadly, his frequent injuries and his price tag, then add in his bonuses and it has clouded people's judgement of when he actually did play. Remember where you're posting Rated him as a player for us, never mentioned his value for money... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy_Fent Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Exactly! A bit like Darren Beckford... although the latter scored that goal at Bolton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.