Bristolatic Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 (edited) Latics first goal at Gillingham has now been credited to Michael Higdon, so here's the amended table. It's not made astronomical changes (or, at least, it doesn't appear to have done) but, as the old lady said when she pissed in the Pacific, every little helps. I've left out the usual highlights other than Stevie_J becoming the high climber (up by 4) and two players swopping places in the Free-to-Play League. Edited October 10, 2015 by Bristolatic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Since when: http://www.skysports.com/football/gillingham-vs-oldham/340209 Says an OG. I wouldn't trust a programme that mentions Tommy Rowe as being a player to watch for Scunny but then omits him from the list on the back page. I want official FA or Football league proof that says the first goal scorer was Higdon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disjointed Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Since when: http://www.skysports.com/football/gillingham-vs-oldham/340209 Says an OG. I wouldn't trust a programme that mentions Tommy Rowe as being a player to watch for Scunny but then omits him from the list on the back page. I want official FA or Football league proof that says the first goal scorer was Higdon. Since when did you start coming over all 24hrs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Since when did you start coming over all 24hrs. When the cheat benefits from this decision based on no evidence whatsoever (currently). I wouldn't put it passed the cheat to bribe big Gordon to ensure the wrong goal scorer is credited in the programme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristolatic Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 BBC website have changed it to Higdon. Confirmed today by Gordon and Roy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudemedic Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 BBC website have changed it to Higdon. Confirmed today by Gordon and Roy.True but in the full article- it still clearly says OG. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/34366307 note the time stamp compared to the sky link Gillingham's official match report has it as an OG too. http://www.gillinghamfootballclub.com/news/article/gillingham-fc-3-3-oldham-fc-official-match-report-2725719.aspx I'm willing to be magnanimous at the moment, especially as the cheat isn't going to be there or there abouts at the end of the season, no matter what he says. I personally wouldn't have done the extra work, especially given what you say in http://www.owtb.co.uk/index.php/topic/47447-gillingham-a-subcription-league-201516/?p=806683 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristolatic Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 I think it's the right result in the end. On the highlights, I thought it could have been on target and it only took about 10 to 15 minutes to change it, so no problem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
24hoursfromtulsehill Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 True but in the full article- it still clearly says OG. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/34366307 note the time stamp compared to the sky link Gillingham's official match report has it as an OG too. http://www.gillinghamfootballclub.com/news/article/gillingham-fc-3-3-oldham-fc-official-match-report-2725719.aspx I'm willing to be magnanimous at the moment, especially as the cheat isn't going to be there or there abouts at the end of the season, no matter what he says. I personally wouldn't have done the extra work, especially given what you say in http://www.owtb.co.uk/index.php/topic/47447-gillingham-a-subcription-league-201516/?p=806683 I agree. The inconsistencies in the time stamps and the delay in the decision warrant a full-blown public judicial inquiry. Maybe the UN should get involved too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.