melia Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 OK Shez has to fork out 70K on a KID!!! A Kid ffs he's not a kid. "one for the future" That can only be tagged to kids the age of -15 . Nowadays if your good enough your old enough. No, 16, 17 and 18 year olds are described as one for the future! If there good enough there in the frey if there not they get shipped out! dont see the point in paying all that money on some who (a Just isn' good enough or B Shez has no intention what so ever in playing him! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Takemeanywhere Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 OK Shez has to fork out 70K on a KID!!! A Kid ffs he's not a kid. "one for the future" That can only be tagged to kids the age of -15 . Nowadays if your good enough your old enough. No, 16, 17 and 18 year olds are described as one for the future! If there good enough there in the frey if there not they get shipped out! dont see the point in paying all that money on some who (a Just isn' good enough or B Shez has no intention what so ever in playing him! Were you aware that Obama is president elect in the USA and that Portsmouth won the F.A. Cup? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeslover Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 OK Shez has to fork out 70K on a KID!!! A Kid ffs he's not a kid. "one for the future" That can only be tagged to kids the age of -15 . Nowadays if your good enough your old enough. No, 16, 17 and 18 year olds are described as one for the future! If there good enough there in the frey if there not they get shipped out! dont see the point in paying all that money on some who (a Just isn' good enough or B Shez has no intention what so ever in playing him! Never quite sat right with me that one, when he's quite a big lad and we've played loads of teenagers recently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLH1993 Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Although Lee did well when he came on last night, it should have been dale that came on. He was the more attacking option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonesyOAFC Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 Not sure why's he not been given his chance to be honest, maybe because there's a fair bit of competition in his position? He's certainly impressed me on the rare occasions i've seen him anyway... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melia Posted November 20, 2008 Author Share Posted November 20, 2008 Shez expert in the transfer market!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
futchers briefs Posted November 20, 2008 Share Posted November 20, 2008 Shez expert in the transfer market!! Get your tranquilisers out meals.......you're nearly another year older you know now..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melia Posted November 20, 2008 Author Share Posted November 20, 2008 [/indent LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkenyonqfc2 Posted November 20, 2008 Share Posted November 20, 2008 Not sure why's he not been given his chance to be honest, maybe because there's a fair bit of competition in his position? He's certainly impressed me on the rare occasions i've seen him anyway...maybe he,s one of the lads shez was on about the other day not working hard in training...hope not though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmr Posted November 20, 2008 Share Posted November 20, 2008 We sign players so that there is good competition for places. Lee, Stephens, Maher and Flemming, none of whom have been given a chance, thus there is no competition for places. The only competition for places in our squad have been between Lomax + Jones and Liddell + Smalley apart from strikers and forced changes. Then we wonder why players get complacent and play crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 One for the future, yes. But is that future at Oldham? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laticsmarra Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 We sign players with a bright future don't have a reserve team so no wonder they don't give 110% in training. Stephens must have played fewer competitive games this year than when he was 6 years old. What is that going to do for motivation and his development into a top player \\\\\\\/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.