LaticsLegend Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 How much? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 How I wish I had thought of that when trying to explain to Razza last week that Eardley being an international doesn't affect his value. Because Davies was a loose inconsistent Cannon who had moved clubs a fair bit and was older. Eardley is 20 played more than 100 games for us and played more times for Wales? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.O.A.M Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 How much? [/quote Undisclosed I guess so probably £525k plus add ons Wrexham will get there cut too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaticsLegend Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Remind me, how much were Wrexham quoted to be getting from the deal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.O.A.M Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Remind me, how much were Wrexham quoted to be getting from the deal? 10-15%? This has come from Paddy who is on holiday in Bulgaria and is in text contact with DS8 so it could be false. Let's see if he gets on official? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafcmetty Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 10-15%? This has come from Paddy who is on holiday in Bulgaria and is in text contact with DS8 so it could be false. Let's see if he gets on official? The article mentioned a 'substantial' add-on, so I'd expect 20% at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.O.A.M Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 The article mentioned a 'substantial' add-on, so I'd expect 20% at least. 10-25% is substancial to non league club, I remember going Gillingham when they scored about £1.8million over Akinbiyi or someone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stitch_KTF Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Because Davies was a loose inconsistent Cannon who had moved clubs a fair bit and was older. Eardley is 20 played more than 100 games for us and played more times for Wales? I agree that Eardley is worth (a lot) more. However, to reiterate, it isn't anything to do with International caps, it's for other reasons (some of which you mention). Anyway... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza699 Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 I agree that Eardley is worth (a lot) more. However, to reiterate, it isn't anything to do with International caps, it's for other reasons (some of which you mention). Anyway... Yeh Im not saying its all down to Caps as someone mentioned .... Rodney Jack. I just think if Lomax was as good as Eardley Eardley would still be worth more . Anyway has Parker signed yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobOAFC Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Yeh Im not saying its all down to Caps as someone mentioned .... Rodney Jack. I just think if Lomax was as good as Eardley Eardley would still be worth more . Anyway has Parker signed yet? No idea, was meant to be signing today but no mention on OS, unless he signed yesterday but gordon made a mess off it? Or penney goin to watch him again against sunderland? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleetwood Blue Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 The scumpool fans know believe they have a real bargain according to the "Vital Blackpool" website, but they are only going off rumours which were started on here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelaticsfan Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Arent we forgetting he was on league 1 team of the year? and there are some crackin players who didnt get on the team because of him... so obviously cant be that bad or where there only 10 decent players in the whole division and they just thought "sod it" give the 11th to anyone? i think not i think the reason eardley isnt rated is because he was one of the unlucky players to be classed as having "huge potential" thats a death sentence at bp because that means you have to show that potential instantly, and if you dont, even if you do better than the rest of the squad, your classed as "no good" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
De_La_Vega Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 I cannot believe that there is anyone on this site who would actually suggest that Holdsworth could be better than Eardley... and in the same breath they would suggest that this is a good enough price. Should be academic because this can't be true - it is too ridiculous for words. Oh, and glad that Parker hasn't been announced because he's asswash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.