Jump to content

Fruitygoo

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    1,351
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Fruitygoo

  1. 11 hours ago, johnafoafc said:

    He dished back after being on the receiving end of dogs abuse, which was understandable at the time. A lot of fans were raw at the club as we seemingly waved the white flag at a playoff shot. Why does he need to apologise?

    Its all well and good giving it back but he obviosuly didnt think that one day he'd be back.... 

     

    He's had a few chances here so possibly he should have been a bit more understanding in why he was getting the abuse due to the way he left. 

     

    Hes been a good servant but the club has been good enough to him in my opinion that he should have held back. 

     

  2. 23 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

     

    Why do people think the top 1% is the super mega rich.  Its people on 160k or more. 

     

    The mega super rich are the top 0.1%. Taxing them raises bugger all.

     

     

    I spoke to numerous people about similar points Labour make out the rich who are paying for everthing are 'super rich'. Me and the mrs have a household income of 90k...decent i know but it puts us in the top 5% in terms of household income.

  3. In fairness, im one of abbotts biggest critics but there was something troubling with the SKY interview this week. I don't know if this was illness ot whether it was self inflicted but there was something wrong. She was confused, slurring, twitchy.... Could be ill, could be drunk...who knows

  4. 2 hours ago, Magic Mikey said:

    Not as disgraceful as the Prime Minister not having the bottle to take part in a televised debate.

     

    She said from the off that she wouldn't and at that point she had a massive lead and much better approval ratings. TV debates are a waste of time... People arguing and making themselves look ridiculous. 

     

    She may not have had the best run in this campaign but i think she was right on that one. 

  5. Man power won't fix this... You can have 20k more police and we'd still be attackeed. You simply cannot watch 20 odd thousand potential terrorists. 

     

    May is right in that internet companies have a lot to answer for. They need to do a hell of a lot more but her views on encryption are terrible. The idea that you can have a government back door into encrypyted comms is both ludicrous and dangerous. 

     

    Immediately after atacks i think round up all of them and put them in a center or two before they have chance to do anything. Soon after you realise you can't just do this to people without just cause... 

     

    We need to increase sentencing for any terror / hate related offences. We need to remove passports and / or block the return of anyone whose been to Syria. We need to deport people if they're not british citizens who are charged with any terror offences. 

     

    Ive recently become a father and this, unfortunately, feels like something that will be around for many years of my little ones life. Its got to be one of the hardest problems to resolve of modern times. 

     

    The best thing we could do in my opinion is some form of cross party review and department to put party politics aside and public safety first. 

  6. 16 minutes ago, kowenicki said:

     

    do I favour a particular outcome...? yes

     

    do I like any of the outcomes, am I inspired by any of them...? no

     

    Politics and politicians in this country are truly awful.

     

    You are working for a particular party. Why would I (or anyone) listen to you?  Your views are biased, preordained and inflexible.  You will tow the party line whatever it is in the pursuit of power.  That's why Corbyn has dropped and u-turned one every belief he ever held... for power.  Power in his hands will be a disaster.  I guarantee he will be an unmitigated disaster.  I'd rather stick with the devil I know on this occasion.

     

     

     

     

    100% agree with this. The people who blindly defend and support their party regardless genetally cancel each other out in sn election because their vote is always the same. 

     

    The people who dont favour a party are the ones who decide it and i dont think corbyn and his team have done anywhere near enough to convince.

     

    Ive voted for both parties in the past and i look at each party and their policies before i make a decision and for me, it has to be the Tories. Why? 

     

    Corp Tax wil see people move away from the UK at a time we need yo convince people to stay through Brexit. Jobs will be lost and Corbyn entire spending change depends on what he can gain extra from corp tax. Increased borrowing and defecit meaning more debt. 

     

    I think the Tories have missed an opportunity to smash Labour out of the park for many years but in fairness, although debt is up, the  deficit is down and this represents a huge turnaround in our national finances. 

     

    Labour will erase that hard work and in 5 yeara the Tories will have to come in and annoy everyone with cuts again. 

     

    Prediction... Increased majority

     

    Labour leader gone (non of his party like him after all) 

     

    Hunt out, Gove in.. Boris moved elsewhere within cabinet. 

  7. 32 minutes ago, UsedtobeWozzer said:

    I think there are serious questions to answer about whether May's cuts have contributed to increased terrorist activity given Manchester and London Bridge attackers were known to security services. That's not just me ex military Paddy Ashdown thinks so too.

     

    i also believe an independent public enquiry is needed to examine claims that Abedi was linked to the Libyan Islamist Fighters Group, that groups link to other Islamist terror groups and also its links to carrying out British Foreign policy by proxy in fighting to overthrow Gaddifi in 2011. It would be quite something if May was found to support known Islamist terror groups wouldn't it? Besides the Saudi government of course.

    You've missed my point completely..... I actually stated that someone could be deemed as 'at fault' but you stated she ALLOWED it to happen which is poorly worded. 

     

    I think Blair was at fault for 7/7 but i dont think he allowed it to happen. It insinuates that May has let 3 attacks happen to help improve  her position somehow. 

  8. 50 minutes ago, UsedtobeWozzer said:

    Didn't see it I was out campaigning. She's a weak link no doubt but if she's failed to hit every target set her like the previous Home Sec now PM and cut the police force by 20k and allowed 3 successful terror attacks in 4 months you'll be right to criticise her at the next election.

    Go watch it.... But prepare to hide behind your sofa 

  9. 48 minutes ago, UsedtobeWozzer said:

    and allowed 3 successful terror attacks in 4 months

     

    Come on... Nobody 'allows' for this to happen. These people dont care who is in charge... They care about us living the way we do. These are typical cheap shots from labour supporters which is the point i outlined before. Anybody who comes out as a supporter is shot down... 

     

    7/7 happened on labours watch but did people blame them for allowing it to happen? 

     

    Being at fault is something you can have an opinion on and blame someone for if you so wish but to say someone 'allowed' it to happen implies they sat back and watched 

×
×
  • Create New...