ddot_m

Yep!

Only time will tell

Tempus fugit.

Yep - when I watched him, he seemed to have a decent set of cogs.

It's hour thread to do with as we please.

Not until we have agreed the minutes

I'll second that

Also he's a big tall chap and should be able to cause more of a nuisance! The dive was embarrassing - he actually has a good shot on him so why not try?!

The inflexibility of Peterborough struck me, when it was obvious that their 2nd half playing from the back wasn't working and they stuck with it I felt hope! Also lovely to see us causing problems from a corner - we have some muscle at long last. Holloway brilliant. What did Shez give them at half time?

You are right - when Robbo would have used a sub Sheridan stuck with the game plan. And (other than the fact that now the ball sticks up front) we had a game plan.

We won

Does that make him our best midfielder? ;-)

Arnold Palmer rather than most of the midfield and he's dead.

By miles

Probably because combined they sound like an ice cream or chocolate supplier...

Looking at the match report from Fleetwood we did provide a couple of good opportunities for Billy, but he seems to have a mental block with finishing against any team above league 2. Definite 0:X

I understand, but can only think the manager doesn't think we are good enough.

I just watch the live ticker on Onefootball, the way I read it it could be el Classico.

Doubt these "punishments" really work. Human nature means that each player, especially the loanees, blames Oldham Athletic, the manager, the players around them and thinks that they are better than everyone else and will just get a contract elsewhere when they need it!

Suppose the context is important, brilliant in comparison to slaughtered turkeys - hell yes.

It's like watching a team of brainless sloths in treacle... Winchester and Croft did make a positive impact, but the managerial failings are that they still can't play an entire game of football. Professional footballers that can't play an entire game? Why are the "strikers" called strikers if they don't strike? - or jump - or win a 50/50 or even a 75/25 in their favour. We don't really play to their strengths, although what they are no one knows. Green is injured or past it and Banks, whilst he can pass the ball is thick with no tackling ability. Clarke is decent, Ripley is decent, Flynn could be good if more central but can't be bothered on the wing. Not sure how we are set up to attack if at all, full back leg it to the halfway line, realise that you're not allowed to go forward, pass it to a CB, over or underhit it long to inadequately sized forward, hope they don't score and repeat.

It a mystery as to why Fane wasn't picked.... Crazy

I wouldn't worry if I were you - hopefully the cameras will follow you to Ipswich and I hope you do well. I would make our "footballers" all meet up to watch the game as well.

I wouldn't start Green, Banks, Reck(F)ord, Ladapo and I'd probably strangle Winchester. If I had to send only 5 down the pit. We all knew the left wing was weak, crazy from the manager.

He looks a player