Wozzer

Never heard of the Journo but has 30k followers.

Confidence draining StB?

Standard for this forum to go off track what about Brexit in or out?

There's a 27 page thread for that at the top of the board ;)

You're off your rocker! Ignoring Evans² and taking them at face value agnostic of the person:

 

"Mate did I tell you? Some bloke came round my nan's and conned her in to giving him £1,500 for a boiler check up! Yeh, he got done for fraud!"

 

"Mate did I tell you? Some bloke came round my nan's..............! Yeh, he got done for rape!"

 

Which one's worse!? I agree that you can extrapolate fraud out to Lehman Brothers levels and then we're getting closer to comparable. But that's not what you've said!

 

The level or rape apologists on is somewhat terrifying.

Whilst I completely agree we do seem to be missing the fact that Evans © is currently guilty of nothing and Evans (S) is a convicted criminal. Still, as a bleeding heart liberal who hopes that rehabilitation of offenders exists, I would employ both.

And here is our fearless leader.

 

Mr. My opinion matters more than anyone else's so I'll scream and shout until you listen.

Indeed, self aggrandisement is so charming.

If we have been mentioned in a winding up court order allegedly been paid. We're is the money coming from for evans

Ignore - just seen other thread.

1/3

How the :censored: would he have access to that level of infomation?

He's retweeting Britain First stuff now too. He might have issues.

Harsh as :censored:.

Particularly on Walker who I think has been outstanding. Mind you I have watched a lot of Connor Brown the past few years.

That's the gamble. The prize is so big now that you could spend an awful lot of money and get nowhere near though. Even being a billionaire is nowt special in the Premiership now. If I was reach and wanted a vanity project I'd start about 8 levels down.

Ah, the Fleetwood model.

Who's this? Tried having a look on Twitter but can't see anything. I am crap with Twitter though.

@jpdoafc

More tweets from the man supposedly itk suggest Evans was introduced to staff as new gaffer at 4pm yesterday.

Evans now 1/2 for us

McCall 1/5 for Bantams

Beat me to it!

McCall is 1/5 for Bradford. Mind you Bunn was 1/10 for us last week, 9/4 now. Bradford are clearly a better option than us at the moment so hopefully they make a decision soon to clear the way for us a bit.

Perhaps they sweetened a deal for Evans by giving him half his salary up front to bung on himself when he was 11/1.

I'm not being entirely serious there by the way.

Chron says Adams, Redfearn, Bunn, Redfearn, McCall, Feeney and Paul Simpson thought to be in contention.

 

Expected the list to be worse than that, tbh. Simpson is an interesting one, with a decent record, plus you'd be happy-ish with all but Feeney.

Redfearn under consideration twice. He's done well there.

McCall 2/1 2nd fav. Bunn evens Adams out to 7/2

 

I always reckon that betting on odds on shots can be some of the best value around as long as it really is a good thing

Oh, I agree. I should perhaps have been more expansive. We may be justifiably favourites at the moment, we have hardly any players after all, but I wouldn't back us at the moment. Let's see what type of squad and manager we have at the beginning of August before lumping the money on.

Whats the odds for relagation next year? I'm slapping £100 on if decent

Favourites. Don't bother.

Eat - wild boar

Wrestle - zebra

Pet - octopus

Have I got it?

Adams evens now. Bunn 4/5.

With the backing of greedy shareholders

Presumably greedy shareholders are interested in making money. Decisions on approval of executive pay would therefore be based on the success of the executives in question. If the greedy shareholders are happy, then the executives deserve larger rewards. Otherwise they are disincentivised to make their shareholders happy.

*stares at Labour Party membership card and thinks "did I really just type that"*

I'm happy that my Latin O Level qualifies me to confirm that ante means before

Maybe it'll allow you to understand my response to the post in question too. Other people seem to have managed it.

Or maybe he uses the right and (correctly) keeps commerically sensative data confidential.

 

Statements that are vague are not necessarily based on incomplete knowledge or uncertainty.

Spot on. I'm amazed transfer fees aren't kept more secretive than they have been. It gives competitors significant financial information about each other and any future transactions that they may wish to undertake with that club.

Simon Brooke may well have access to all the information he needs to carry out his duty, putting that information into the public domain so that other League one clubs can have a good nosy really isn't part of that duty.

 

He wont be able disclose the undisclosed though, and from what they tell me on here the books won't reveal where every penny has gone.

You're labouring this every penny point too much BP. By definition that would mean looking into the salary details of every employee. It's simply not happening, nor should it. I'm no expert on data protection but it would probably be illegal too.

Well he has drifted to 1/8 ;)