-
Posts
11,555 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Downloads
Articles
Everything posted by kowenicki
-
“I am guessing with zero basis for my guess” would be more accurate.
-
How can you possibly know this? ... also, as Gary said above, you are ignoring the evidence of his career so far. He is undoubtedly a good player and it’s up to him to realise his talent.
-
Next 3 League games
kowenicki replied to Londonboy's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
It is. Impressive. Notts County defence must have had a mare though. -
Next 3 League games
kowenicki replied to Londonboy's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Notts C 0 - 4 Yeovil ....but “9 points is a must” apparently. Far too too early for some of the nonsense spoken on this forum. -
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
If course it’s easy to go after him, he will have signed warrants. But is there any point, has he got anything to go after? -
So not “gone” not “suspended” as reported by those ‘in the know’. Not yet anyway. Lets hope it’s resolved soon.
-
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Christ. Every cloud then eh... -
Perhaps. But after 180 minutes of football!? Do me a favour.
-
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Where did I say we had 3m debts? -
Project five thirty eight predicts! ?
kowenicki replied to kowenicki's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Also... Top 500. Get in !! https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/global-club-soccer-rankings/ 490 Reus 0.6 1.5 23.9 491 Grenoble 0.7 1.7 23.8 492 Sirius 1.1 2.2 23.8 493 Fleetwood Town 0.8 1.7 23.7 494 Oldham Athletic 0.9 1.9 23.7 495 SuperSport Utd 0.6 1.6 23.7 496 St Johnstone 0.8 1.8 23.7 497 Plymouth Argyle 0.8 1.9 23.4 498 Livingston 0.8 1.8 23.3 499 Sochaux 0.8 1.9 23.3 500 Lugo 0.7 1.6 23.2 501 W. Phoenix 0.9 2.0 23.2 502 Portland 2 1.0 2.2 22.9 503 St Mirren 0.8 1.8 22.8 504 Shrewsbury Town 0.7 1.7 22.8 505 Saint Louis 0.8 1.8 22.8 506 LA Galaxy II 1.2 2.5 22.0 507 Red Star 0.7 1.8 21.9 508 San Antonio 0.8 1.9 21.6 509 AmaZulu 0.6 1.6 21.5 510 Rochdale 0.7 1.9 21.4 511 Chippa United 0.6 1.6 21.3 512 Luton Town 0.7 1.8 21.3 -
This is... er..... erm..... we we are going up! https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/soccer-predictions/league-two/ LEAGUE TWO 2018-19 season END-OF-SEASON PROBABILITIES TEAM SPI REL. PROM. WIN LEAGUE MK Dons6 pts 25.3 <1% 67% 31% Oldham Athletic1 pt 23.7 <1% 49% 14% Lincoln City6 pts 18.4 <1% 39% 11% Exeter City6 pts 18.6 <1% 37% 10% Mansfield Town4 pts 18.4 <1% 33% 8% Bury3 pts 18.1 <1% 31% 7% Northampton1 pt 17.9 1% 26% 5% Crewe Alexandra3 pts 15.1 3% 16% 3% Forest Green4 pts 13.2 3% 13% 2% Notts County1 pt 13.2 4% 12% 2% Carlisle United1 pt 12.1 5% 10% 1% Stevenage4 pts 11.6 5% 10% 1% Swindon Town3 pts 12.5 6% 10% 1% Colchester United4 pts 9.3 5% 8% <1% Cambridge United3 pts 11.8 6% 9% 1% Tranmere Rovers4 pts 10.3 6% 8% <1% Crawley Town3 pts 10.1 10% 6% <1% Newport County3 pts 7.6 13% 3% <1% Port Vale3 pts 8.0 14% 3% <1% Yeovil Town1 pt 8.3 16% 3% <1% Grimsby Town3 pts 7.0 18% 2% <1% Cheltenham Town0 pts 8.3 20% 2% <1% Macclesfield Town0 pts 7.5 22% 2% <1% Morecambe0 pts 6.2 41% <1% <1%
-
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Yeah. Its almost as though people expect 20 years to be fixed in 6 months. Consolidate and secure the club. Then progress. -
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Has Corney got the funds to settle any warrants in a PSA? Probably not worth the paper they would be written on. -
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Well said. For his first 6 months what he has done well for me. Let’s see what he can do in the next 6 to 12. -
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Even the Facebook mob are receiving this statement well. You have to be a special kind of miserable or extremely arrogant to actually want to find fault with it. Even our Ryan is generally positive about it! -
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Down the swanny? Are you suggesting he should have ignored the debts, entered admin and restarted at the bottom of the pyramid? -
Was this thread before or after the statement?
-
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Clubs in the League 1 and League 2 operate within a Spending Constraint framework termed Salary Cost Management Protocol (SMCP). SCMP limits spending on player wages to a percentage of club Turnover. In League 1 clubs can spend a maximum of 60% of their turnover on wages - in League 2, the limit is 55%. There are no restrictions (in themselves) on the amount a club can lose or spend on transfer fees. Initially introduced into League 2 in 2004/5 for guidance purposes, sanctions for breaching the SCMP thresholds were introduced during the 2011/12 season, with Swindon the first club to be sanctioned under the rules. The process is interactive with clubs providing the Football League with projections for the spending for the coming season. During the season the clubs provide regular updates on their Turnover and wage bill. Any club that is forecasting a wage spend within 5% of the figure will be scrutinised more closely. Where a club is on course to exceed the limits, the Football League will apply a Transfer Embargo. Crucially, a club doesn't have to overspend to incur the embargo, it only needs to shown to be heading for an overspend. This interactive approach enables clubs to increase their wage bill if their circumstances improve - a successful cup run will generate increased income and the Football League may be able to sanction additional wage spend. Because SCMP doesn't rely on the retrospective scrutiny of club accounts, it is also extremely effective at stopping overspend before the spending actually occurs (something that has been a problem for the Championship's version of FFP). The Football League's website's explanation of the rules doesn't go into a great deal of detail about how they operate. However they have responded to enquiries and confirmed a number of areas that help us to better understand the rules. -
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Dunno. But he’s bang on. -
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Ive explained my answer in the large edit. It applies to you and others. We can’t have it both ways. -
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
Honest statement. He’s chucked 3m and people will still give him shit. I also am happy he has has defended himself against the shit that was thrown by the likes of Davies. Just an entitled footballer trying to leave mid/contract for higher wages who then downed tools in a sulk. -
Statement by Chairman
kowenicki replied to parigby's topic in The opinions4u Terraces - Latics Forum
He has to operate on a level that is sutainable. Isn’t that what we all wanted all along!? We can’t change the thing we moan about simply so we can carry on moaning. Corny got grief for carrying debt and not paying bills/wages. People pointed to Dale as a god example of a well run club, saying why can’t we do that? He now tries to do that after considerable cleaning up with £3m of his cash and those same people still moan? It’s ridiculous. -
You are exaggerating. Again. Fane would (will) walk in to the current midfield. I’m not saying Gardner shouldn’t be there I’m just saying he is ok, nothing more. They have different roles, but you already know that.
-
Or he doesn’t get his head up...
-
Yet he isn’t sticking in a piss poor Carlisle team. Kelly massively overrated too imo. Also not featuring for Cov. Ooooooo controversial. ?