Prendy_1984 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 A definition of this over-used word 'gash' would be appreciated as well. Gash Noun 1. Fanny 2. Deep cut Gash adj. :censored: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc0000 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 (edited) Gash Noun 1. Fanny 2. Deep cut Gash adj. :censored: Like I said...awesome word Edited February 12, 2009 by oafc0000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc1955 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 maybe he hasnt been brought in to play in defence I hope you're right because a defender is the last thing we need at the moment...Eardley,Lomax,Hazell,Stam,Gregan,Golbourne, and very soon Jones is more than enough. Makes me think that Stam might be going out on loan for a month due to a lack of games. If he comes back match fit then it can only be a good move. This lack of reserve games has been a disaster in terms of players fitness and needs a rethink next season. Still think we need a playmaker to boost our promo / playoff chances! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Like I said...awesome word As I said earlier, I think goals conceded is a good benchmark. so to use your awesome word, last season's defensive partnerships were (in reverse ORDURE): Trotman/Stam - Gash Hazell/Stam - More Gash Gregan/Stam - Yet More Gash Hazell/Gregan - Scarily large GASH Gash is a :censored: word!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prendy_1984 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 As I said earlier, I think goals conceded is a good benchmark. so to use your awesome word, last season's defensive partnerships were (in reverse ORDURE): Trotman/Stam - Gash Hazell/Stam - More Gash Gregan/Stam - Yet More Gash Hazell/Gregan - Scarily large GASH Gash is a :censored: word!!! Scarily large Gash is poor use of the word. Would you ever describe them as scarily large :censored:? I would say :censored: is a gash word! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Scarily large Gash is poor use of the word. Would you ever describe them as scarily large :censored:? I would say :censored: is a gash word! I'm probably about the same height as Hazell but I can honestly say that Gregan is a scarily large :censored:. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prendy_1984 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Mike you are getting confused. You have used the word :censored: as a noun. Gash = :censored: as an adjective. I suppose you could've used it to describe Gregan as a scarily large fanny. However not sure that would be wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikejh45 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Mike you are getting confused. You have used the word :censored: as a noun. Gash = :censored: as an adjective. I suppose you could've used it to describe Gregan as a scarily large fanny. However not sure that would be wise. You are correct in pointing out my error. But, in everyday common language usage, the word :censored: is often used as a noun. So, as today is one of my everdays, I re-iterate that Gregan is a scarily large :censored: but I do draw the line at calling him that other part of the female anatomy that you alluded to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edhunteruk Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 You are correct in pointing out my error. But, in everyday common language usage, the word :censored: is often used as a noun. So, as today is one of my everdays, I re-iterate that Gregan is a scarily large :censored: but I do draw the line at calling him that other part of the female anatomy that you alluded to. if he has been brought in purely for cover,as hazell is nearing a suspension then ok,not got a problem with it... another of shez long term targets,thats seems to be ill get him no matter what. if he has been brought in to play in midfield,then how the hell must lee be feeling right now. the difference between this one and jones signing,jones is more than willing to sign for us permanant should we go up,this lad aint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyPimp Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 In the spirit of democracy and to attempt to get this damned thread back on track, can we have a poll to decide whether the word 'gash' should be censored on this site? Personally I hate it and it has become so overused it's actually starting to offend me. I'm not a prude, priest or prick by the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prendy_1984 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 You can not censor the word gash. You think we're living in China or summot? Its my favourite word Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oafc0000 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 In the spirit of democracy and to attempt to get this damned thread back on track, can we have a poll to decide whether the word 'gash' should be censored on this site? Personally I hate it and it has become so overused it's actually starting to offend me. I'm not a prude, priest or prick by the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigDog Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 if he has been brought in purely for cover,as hazell is nearing a suspension then ok,not got a problem with it... another of shez long term targets,thats seems to be ill get him no matter what. if he has been brought in to play in midfield,then how the hell must lee be feeling right now. the difference between this one and jones signing,jones is more than willing to sign for us permanant should we go up,this lad aint. Hines - 57 varieties It sounds like he can play right back/left back/central defence/goal etc - good cover for a number of positions (if he's any good that is) - on the other hand if he's gash.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garcon Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Was about to mention, most seem to have missed the fact he's played in both full back positions as well as centre half. Oh, on the point of our favourite word and the earlier stated definitions, does that mean there could be such a thing as a gash gash? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prendy_1984 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 I cant see a reason why they couldn't be a gash gash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garcon Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 One could argue there's far too much gash gash... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prendy_1984 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 But you could say gash gash is better than no gash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.