brad Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 I don't understand Dickov with this lad he was named on the bench today and I thought ye should of come on with 10 minutes to go and we would of gone 3 upfront. Instead Paul dick***d brings on sutherland any manager would of stuck on the extra striker and gone for it. Will Taylor ever get a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldhamains Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 "Paul dick***d" how old are you? We already had 3 striker's on anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad Posted November 10, 2012 Author Share Posted November 10, 2012 I'm 17 and he is a d*****ad and I don't think we did because baxter went into the middle when smith came on. Baxter is not a striker by the way he plays behind the striker so what games have you been watching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldhamains Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Baxter is still a striker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad Posted November 10, 2012 Author Share Posted November 10, 2012 He's not a striker he plays behind the striker and then gets put into midfield that is not a striker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldhamains Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 He's not a striker he plays behind the striker and then gets put into midfield that is not a striker We could do this all night mate. I think he's still a striker even though he plays just behind. You don't! If you don't think he's a striker what position would you say he plays? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad Posted November 10, 2012 Author Share Posted November 10, 2012 Its quite hard to say he's a centre attacking mid or centre forward which I wouldn't class as a striker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobOAFC Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 I don't understand Dickov with this lad he was named on the bench today and I thought ye should of come on with 10 minutes to go and we would of gone 3 upfront. Instead Paul dick***d brings on sutherland any manager would of stuck on the extra striker and gone for it. Will Taylor ever get a chance. He brought on an attacking player to provide crosses for at least two strikers, three dependin on your view. Little point on having 4 upfront with no service and being outnumbered in midfield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Getting Smith on made sense. The lad won every header, again, and directed most of them intelligently too. Sutherland for an under-par Croft? Made sense and the sub got round the back well on a couple of occasions. He looks full of promise. M'Changama was the one that bemused me a little. But he nearly scored an equaliser. While I'm far from happy at losing, I think the team played well and the manager made intelligent substitutions. A little more concentration at the back ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad Posted November 10, 2012 Author Share Posted November 10, 2012 I would of kept Croft on and brought Taylor on give the lad a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 I would of kept Croft on and brought Taylor on give the lad a chance. Croft needed replacing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobOAFC Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 I would of kept Croft on and brought Taylor on give the lad a chance. Who would you of took off though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byrnes boots Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Montano he was crap moaned a lot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad Posted November 10, 2012 Author Share Posted November 10, 2012 Before subs were made wesolowski for Smith like dickov and Wabarra for Taylor would of put Baxter in midfield and play a 3-4-3 formation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hands on Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Wonderful to perform so well in losing again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lags Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 (edited) Its quite hard to say he's a centre attacking mid or centre forward which I wouldn't class as a striker Explain that to me, a centre forward isn't a striker..... Edited November 10, 2012 by Lags Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robboman Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 To be fair on fifa a player can be either 'CF' (centre forward) or 'ST' (striker)...! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lags Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 (edited) Well am sorry call me old fashioned but a centre forward is a striker. Edited November 10, 2012 by Lags Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad Posted November 10, 2012 Author Share Posted November 10, 2012 To be fair on fifa a player can be either 'CF' (centre forward) or 'ST' (striker)...! see he gets what I mean they are different positions on the pitch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lags Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 see he gets what I mean they are different positions on the pitch Aye 1 person takes about Fifa... the real thing. Give up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beag_teeets Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 Dan Taylor isn't ready for first team league one football, that was gleaned from the recent fans forum when Dickov said that some young players find it hard to adjust from age group football to the league. His job as manager is to keep them interested and in love with the game whilst guiding them through the progression. If Simpson had been fit he would have been on the bench (or on the pitch) and Taylor was only named in the squad to make up the place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 If Simpson had been fit he would have been on the bench (or on the pitch) and Taylor was only named in the squad to make up the place. Naming seven subs when you can only use three is one of the more stupid rules in the Football League. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
super_blue Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 Naming seven subs when you can only use three is one of the more stupid rules in the Football League. Not at all, it does 2 things that are helpful... 1. Gives the manager a variety of options in his substitution selection depending how the game goes. 2. Gives young players the opportunity to be involved in match day squads that helps there development and who knows they may get a chance from there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opinions4u Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 Not at all, it does 2 things that are helpful... 1. Gives the manager a variety of options in his substitution selection depending how the game goes. 2. Gives young players the opportunity to be involved in match day squads that helps there development and who knows they may get a chance from there. Five is more than enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshgaz Posted November 11, 2012 Share Posted November 11, 2012 Five is more than enough. No harm in Having 7 though really is there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.