I haven't voted because I'm torn over this issue. On the one hand, I do think the pitch suffers, because of the extra wear and tear and reduction in time it gets for 'recovery'. However, there aren't any other real reasons for wanting the rugby out. I'm not a rugby fan, can't stand the sport, but I do hope they can make a go of things. This leads to the other side of the argument; if the rugby were chucked out of BP, they'd be lucky to survive. Let's face it, they will be anyway. If the rugby are part of the BP plans then it will help to ensure that the council and such like view the project in a positive light. It would be nice if a floodlit training facility, with limited spectator facilities, could be included in the project though so that rugby and reserve team football could be played there instead.