Jump to content

lookers87

OWTB Member
  • Posts

    510
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lookers87

  1. Wrong - liquidation means nothing unless the insolvency practitioner has identified wrongdoing - there is nothing of the sort associated with this company. liquidations or dissolving companies can happen for any number of reasons majority are natural/innocent/all above board. I think you may be mixing up the FL rules which I think make mention to football clubs going into liquidation and puts a number on it. It's great news we've got Anna joining the board. Well done Mr Corney.
  2. Scott Spencer named as one of those approached by Facey - but no implications that he was involved
  3. Spoken to him a few times recently and he's doing very well. He's at most home games.
  4. His former assistant being a certain Gunnar Halle
  5. All Chris is saying is that a meeting on matchdays is not being ruled out - however what we would all prefer is a venue at the club to make it easier for the maximum amount of people to attend. We regularly discuss options but until the new stand is closer we aren't able to know exactly what is available to us. A pub has also been discussed but that provides it's own challenges too. Fan matchday meetings haven't been ruled out.
  6. Of course. Happy to put them in direct contact with the trust advisors should that help. Thanks LL
  7. Metty he stepped down with immediate effect, as was said an acting chair will be announced soon
  8. http://www.trustoldham.co.uk/statement-regarding-rumours/ Thanks to 24 and LL for your recent updates/clarification too.
  9. Just got in from battling the snow, and not had chance to go through the whole thread - as underdog said legal advisers (the same that have seen the whole process through I believe) have clarified the shares do belong to the trust. Apologies for the quick post but I believe they'll be full clarification soon as.
  10. No to the first, yes to the second. Must stress though it was a positive debate and no decisions (on those) have been finalised.
  11. Can't quite agree on the travel agent example but I'll take the rest onboard and review it - thanks!
  12. 000 from my pov the Trust haven't been presenting themselves as members of SD - it was decided that the page dedicated to SD on the website should stay as, though there are reasons for the non-membership,(Im not entirely clear what these are as I've never personally discussed it in detail - I will ask the question though), the principles of Trust/fan say/ownership are still aligned and we wanted to direct anyone that wanted to know more about SD to them. On this occasion it's my understanding that SD may have seen the way a couple of journalists referred to/paraphrased the name of the "Trust" and for some reason thought it worthy of a statement. Happy to clear up the rest to for you once I've met with fellow directors on Monday. I've got a game to get to
×
×
  • Create New...